AI Article Synopsis

  • The review investigates the long-term efficacy and safety of midurethral sling (MUS) procedures for stress urinary incontinence, focusing on retropubic (RP-MUS) and transobturator (TO-MUS) methods.
  • The research analyzed data from 49 relevant studies, comparing outcomes of MUS procedures and looking at factors like objective and subjective cure rates, complications, and injury risks.
  • Findings indicate that while both RP-MUS and TO-MUS have similar objective cure rates, RP-MUS shows higher subjective cure rates and different complication profiles, highlighting the need for careful consideration when choosing a treatment method.

Article Abstract

Introduction And Hypothesis: Questions regarding the long-term efficacy and safety of midurethral slings (MUS) are still unresolved, notwithstanding the widespread use of these procedures. The objective of this review was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of retropubic MUS (RP-MUS) procedures and the medium-term outcomes of transobturator MUS (TO-MUS) procedures.

Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, NLH, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar databases were searched up to June 2014 with restriction to English language and using the search terms: "stress urinary incontinence", "midurethral sling", "tension-free tape", "transobturator tape", and "follow-up". Studies with a follow-up of 36 months for TO-MUS and 60 months for RP-MUS were searched. Only studies comparing a RP-MUS or TO-MUS with another synthetic sling were included. Data from 49 studies were included. Data were expressed as odds ratios (OR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) and combined using the Mantel-Haenszel fixed effects model. Differences in the proportions were evaluated using the chi-squared test.

Results: RP-MUS had similar objective cure rates (OR 1.15, 95 % CI 0.75 - 1.76) but higher subjective cure rates than TO-MUS (OR 1.76, 95 % CI 1.08 - 2.86). No differences were observed between outside-in (TOT) and inside-out (TVT-O) and between TO-MUS and minisling. Bladder injuries were more frequent (OR 7.01, 95 % CI 2.94 - 17.90) and vaginal erosions were less frequent for RP-MUS (OR 0.24, 95 % CI 0.07 - 0.84). Vaginal injuries were more common with TOT than with TVT-O (OR 7.96, 95 % CI 1.15 - 157.9). Pain-related complications were more common with TO-MUS than with minimally invasive tapes (OR 8.75; 95 % CI 9.02 - 57.90).

Conclusions: MUS have similar objective cure rates in the long term and medium term. TO-MUS is associated with a lower subjective cure rate than RP-MUS.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2645-5DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cure rates
12
long-term outcomes
8
midurethral slings
8
included data
8
objective cure
8
subjective cure
8
to-mus
7
rp-mus
6
medium-term long-term
4
outcomes placement
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!