Objective: To investigate which spinal mobility measures (SMMs) are most frequently impaired in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS), whether a hierarchy of impairment can be established, and whether assessing fewer measures sufficiently captures impairment in spinal mobility.

Methods: Patients from the Outcome in Ankylosing Spondylitis International Study were followed up for 12 years. SMMs were considered impaired when falling below predefined cutoffs, derived from normal individuals. The proportion of patients in whom each SMM was impaired was calculated using baseline observation. In patients with ≥1 impaired SMM, we investigated how often impairment in spinal mobility would be missed if only a fixed number of SMMs was assessed. Analyses were repeated using all 12-year observations.

Results: A total of 216 patients were included (70% males). Lateral spinal flexion (LSF) was the most frequently impaired measure, followed by the modified Schober (mSchober) test, tragus-to-wall, cervical rotation, intermalleolar distance, and chest expansion measures, respectively. This hierarchy was strikingly consistent over time, and independent of sex, symptom duration, and presence of syndesmophytes. In patients with ≥1 impaired SMM, LSF was impaired most frequently (86%), followed by the mSchober test (58%). If only LSF was measured, 14% of patients with impairment in any SMM would be missed; if additionally the mSchober test was measured, 9% would be missed.

Conclusion: LSF followed by the mSchober test are the most frequently impaired mobility measures in AS, reflecting an earlier involvement of the lumbar spine, followed by involvement of the thoracic and cervical spine. In clinical practice LSF and the mSchober test suffice to screen impairment in spinal mobility.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr.22614DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mschober test
20
impairment spinal
16
spinal mobility
16
mobility measures
12
ankylosing spondylitis
12
frequently impaired
12
hierarchy impairment
8
impaired
8
patients ≥1
8
≥1 impaired
8

Similar Publications

Objective: To compare spinal symptoms and spinal/hip mobility at baseline and 2 years in early axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and non-axSpA chronic back pain (BP) patients.

Methods: Baseline and 2 years data of the SPondyloarthritis Caught Early cohort were analysed. Outcomes assessed: overall BP, BP at night, morning stiffness (MS) intensity, MS duration, occiput-to-wall distance (OWD), cervical rotation, chest expansion, lateral spinal flexion (LSF), modified Schober test (mSchober), intermalleolar distance (IMD) and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Anthropometrics, flexibility and training history as determinants for bicycle configuration.

Sports Med Health Sci

June 2021

Department of Human Biology, Division of Exercise Science and Sports Medicine, University of Cape Town, South Africa.

Intrinsic factors such as leg length, arm length, flexibility and training history are factors that may be relevant to the optimisation of the individual bicycle configuration process. Bike fitting methods do not always take all these variables into account, and as yet there have been limited studies examining how these variables can affect the cyclist's position on the bicycle. The main aims of this study were to establish how individual anthropometrics, training history and flexibility may influence cyclists' freely chosen bicycle configuration, and to determine the full-body static flexion angles chosen by cyclists on the bicycle.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Clinically, sagittal spinal mobility is objectively assessed by forward bending range of motion (ROM) tests such as the modified-Schober test (m-Schober test). However, evidence comparing ROM during forward bending and daily activities is limited. In this study, a kinematic model including six spinal regions, pelvic/sacral and femur segment was used to characterize associations between m-Schober test and return from forward bending (RFB), and between RFB and lifting.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To investigate which spinal mobility measures (SMMs) are most frequently impaired in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS), whether a hierarchy of impairment can be established, and whether assessing fewer measures sufficiently captures impairment in spinal mobility.

Methods: Patients from the Outcome in Ankylosing Spondylitis International Study were followed up for 12 years. SMMs were considered impaired when falling below predefined cutoffs, derived from normal individuals.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Assessments of lumbar flexion range of motion: intertester reliability and concurrent validity of 2 commonly used clinical tests.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

February 2014

From the Department of Health Sciences, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Study Design: Cross-sectional.

Objective: To compare intertester reliability and concurrent validity of 2 frequently used methods for assessing lumbar flexion range of motion: the fingertip-to-floor distance (FFD) test and the modified Schober (mSchober) test.

Summary Of Background Data: An assessment of lumbar flexion range of motion is often incorporated in the clinical evaluation of patients with low back pain, as well as in clinical studies when examining the effects of different therapies on these patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!