Objective: Recurrent lumbar disc herniation has been defined as disc herniation at the same level, regardless of ipsilateral or contralateral herniation, with a pain-free interval greater than 6 months. The aim of this study is to analyze outcomes and identify the potential risk factors for recurrent lumbar disc herniation.
Methods: The authors retrospectively reviewed the cases of 178 patients who underwent open discectomy for single-level lumbar disc herniation. Visual analogue scales and modified Macnab criteria were used to compare the clinical outcomes between the recurrent group and the non-recurrent group. Sex, age, discectomy level, degree of disc degeneration, type of disc herniation, pain-free interval after first-operation, smoking status, and trauma were investigated as potential recurrence risk factors.
Results: Of the 178 patients for whom the authors were able to definitely assess symptomatic recurrence status, 18 patients (10.1%) underwent revision surgery for recurrent disc herniation. The most common level involved was L4-L5 (61%) and the mean period of time to recurrence was 18.7 months (6-61 months). There were 17 cases of ipsilateral herniation and 1 case of contralateral herniation. The types of herniation for which revision surgery was done were protrusion (3 cases), and transligamentous extrusion (14 cases). There were five excellent, eight good, and two fair results.
Conclusion: Repeated discectomy for recurrent disc herniation produced unsatisfactory outcomes. Factors such as sex, type of disc herniation and traumatic events were found to be significant risk factors.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4430997 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/kjs.2012.9.3.170 | DOI Listing |
Int J Spine Surg
January 2025
Department of Neurosurgery, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana (AOUP), Pisa, Italy
Introduction: Recurrent lumbar disc herniation (rLDH) remains a challenge in spinal surgery. This systematic review analyzes the use of transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (TFED) for the treatment of rLDH.
Methods: A comprehensive search of 4 electronic databases, including PubMed, Google Scholar, Science Direct, and Cochrane, was conducted.
World Neurosurg
January 2025
Department of Neurosurgery, Hopital Bretonneau, Tours, France. Electronic address:
Purpose: Lumbar disc herniation, canal stenosis and cervicarthrosis are degenerative spinal pathologies frequently observed in the aging population of patients with Parkinson Disease (PD). Spinal surgery in PD patients remains risky with uncertain functional results. The main issue is to determine whether a surgical procedure should be performed on PD patients with common degenerative spinal pathologies (CDSP).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Orthop Translat
January 2025
Department of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 300 Guangzhou Rd, Nanjing, 210029, China.
World Neurosurg
January 2025
First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, 300381, China; National Clinical Research Center for Chinese Medicine Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Tianjin, 300381, China. Electronic address:
World Neurosurg
January 2025
Department of Spine Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530021, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China. Electronic address:
Background: A sufficient foraminoplasty is critical in percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy (PETD) for lumbar disc herniation (LDH), which may affect the progress of surgery. This study assessed the repeated foraminoplasty applicated in PETD for LDH patients with lumbar foraminal stenosis (LFS).
Methods: 133 LDH patients with LFS who underwent PETD were enrolled in this study, which were segregated into the traditional foraminoplasty group (TF group) and the repeated foraminoplasty group (RF group).
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!