Objective: Readmission after surgery is an unwanted adverse event that is costly to the healthcare system. We sought to evaluate factors associated with increased risk of readmission and to characterize the nature of these readmissions in patients who have esophageal cancer.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed in 306 patients with esophageal carcinoma who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by esophagectomy at Johns Hopkins Hospital between 1993 and 2011. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with 30-day readmission. Readmissions were defined as inpatient admissions to our institution within 30 days of discharge.

Results: The median age at surgery was 61 years; the median postoperative length of stay was 9 days; and 48% of patients had ≥1 postoperative complication (POC). The 30-day readmission rate was 13.7% (42 of 306). In univariate analysis, length of stay and having ≥1 POC were significantly associated with readmission. In multivariate analysis, having ≥1 POC was significantly associated with a >2-fold increase in risk for 30-day readmission (odds ratio 2.35, with 95% confidence interval [1.08-5.09], P = .031) when controlling for age at diagnosis and length of stay. Of the 42 patients who were readmitted, 67% experienced POCs after surgery; 50% of patients who experienced POCs were readmitted for reasons related to their postoperative complication. The most common reasons for readmission were pulmonary issues (29%), anastomotic complications (20%), gastrointestinal concerns (17%), and venous thromboembolism (14%).

Conclusions: Complications not adequately managed before discharge may lead to readmission. Quality improvement efforts surrounding venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, and discharging patients nothing-by-mouth, may be warranted.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.01.064DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

30-day readmission
12
length stay
12
patients readmitted
8
readmission
8
factors associated
8
patients esophageal
8
postoperative complication
8
≥1 poc
8
poc associated
8
experienced pocs
8

Similar Publications

Introduction: Ineffective coordination during care transitions from hospitals to skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) costs Medicare US$2.8-US$3.4 billion annually and results in avoidable adverse events.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Individuals with mental illness are at risk for poor surgical outcomes. Notably, the impact of preoperative assessment and optimization for high-risk surgical procedures remains a relatively understudied and evolving field. We sought to investigate the association between mental health assessment and postoperative outcomes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: The purpose of this study is to conduct a follow up analysis comparing operational and quality measures of the pre-residency period with those of a mature program comprised of a full cohort of 15 residents, with 3 residents in each post graduate year (PGY) 1-5.

Design: A retrospective review of 25,900 surgeries performed by the general, breast, plastics, thoracic, and vascular services at a single regional medical center was performed and surgeries were classified as pre-residency period and residency period. Independent variables included patient demographics, comorbidity burden, emergency department arrivals, and outcomes of interest included daily elective case volume, the percent of cases performed during 'off-hours' (defined as 7p-7a), operating room (OR) and procedure minutes, average length of stay (LOS), average total hospital charges, rates of 30-day return to OR (ROR), ED visits, and readmissions, and patient satisfaction.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Patients with heart failure frequently face the possibility of rehospitalization following an initial hospital stay, placing a significant burden on both patients and health care systems. Accurate predictive tools are crucial for guiding clinical decision-making and optimizing patient care. However, the effectiveness of existing models tailored specifically to the Chinese population is still limited.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have gained widespread acceptance as a means to enhance surgical outcomes. However, the intricate care required for kidney transplant recipients has not yet led to the establishment of a universally recognized and dependable ERAS protocol for kidney transplantation.

Objective: We devised a customized ERAS protocol to determine its effectiveness in improving surgical and postoperative outcomes among kidney transplant recipients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!