AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates whether high-flow oxygen therapy is a better option compared to standard oxygen therapy and noninvasive ventilation for patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, focusing on intubation rates and mortality outcomes.* -
  • In a trial involving 310 patients, the intubation rates were similar across all three treatment groups, but the high-flow oxygen group had the most ventilator-free days (24 days) compared to the other methods.* -
  • Findings suggest that while intubation rates did not significantly differ, high-flow oxygen therapy was associated with lower 90-day mortality rates compared to standard oxygen and noninvasive ventilation.*

Article Abstract

Background: Whether noninvasive ventilation should be administered in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure is debated. Therapy with high-flow oxygen through a nasal cannula may offer an alternative in patients with hypoxemia.

Methods: We performed a multicenter, open-label trial in which we randomly assigned patients without hypercapnia who had acute hypoxemic respiratory failure and a ratio of the partial pressure of arterial oxygen to the fraction of inspired oxygen of 300 mm Hg or less to high-flow oxygen therapy, standard oxygen therapy delivered through a face mask, or noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients intubated at day 28; secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality in the intensive care unit and at 90 days and the number of ventilator-free days at day 28.

Results: A total of 310 patients were included in the analyses. The intubation rate (primary outcome) was 38% (40 of 106 patients) in the high-flow-oxygen group, 47% (44 of 94) in the standard group, and 50% (55 of 110) in the noninvasive-ventilation group (P=0.18 for all comparisons). The number of ventilator-free days at day 28 was significantly higher in the high-flow-oxygen group (24±8 days, vs. 22±10 in the standard-oxygen group and 19±12 in the noninvasive-ventilation group; P=0.02 for all comparisons). The hazard ratio for death at 90 days was 2.01 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01 to 3.99) with standard oxygen versus high-flow oxygen (P=0.046) and 2.50 (95% CI, 1.31 to 4.78) with noninvasive ventilation versus high-flow oxygen (P=0.006).

Conclusions: In patients with nonhypercapnic acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, treatment with high-flow oxygen, standard oxygen, or noninvasive ventilation did not result in significantly different intubation rates. There was a significant difference in favor of high-flow oxygen in 90-day mortality. (Funded by the Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique Interrégional 2010 of the French Ministry of Health; FLORALI ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01320384.).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1503326DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

high-flow oxygen
28
acute hypoxemic
16
hypoxemic respiratory
16
respiratory failure
16
noninvasive ventilation
12
standard oxygen
12
oxygen
11
oxygen nasal
8
nasal cannula
8
oxygen therapy
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!