Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The aim of this study was to evaluate the capacity of BR55, an ultrasound contrast agent specifically targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2), to distinguish the specific anti-VEGFR2 therapy effect of sunitinib from other anti-angiogenic effects of a therapy (imatinib) that does not directly inhibit VEGFR2. Sunitinib, imatinib and placebo were administered daily for 11 d (264 h) to 45 BalbC mice bearing ectopic CT26 murine colorectal carcinomas. During the course of therapy, B-mode ultrasound, contrast-enhanced ultrasound and VEGFR2-targeted contrast-enhanced ultrasound were performed to assess tumor morphology, vascularization and VEGFR2 expression, respectively. The angiogenic effects on these three aspects were characterized using tumor volume, contrast-enhanced area and differential targeted enhancement. Necrosis, microvasculature and expression of VEGFR2 were also determined by histology and immunostaining. B-Mode imaging revealed that tumor growth was significantly decreased in sunitinib-treated mice at day 11 (p < 0.05), whereas imatinib did not affect growth. Functional evaluation revealed that the contrast-enhanced area decreased significantly (p < 0.02) and by similar amounts under both anti-angiogenic treatments by day 8 (192 h): -23% for imatinib and -21% for sunitinib. No significant decrease was observed in the placebo group. Targeted contrast-enhanced imaging revealed lower differential targeted enhancement, that is, lower levels of VEGFR2 expression, in sunitinib-treated mice relative to placebo-treated mice from 24 h (p < 0.05) and relative to both placebo- and imatinib-treated mice from 48 h (p < 0.05). Histologic assessment of tumors after the final imaging indicated that necrotic area was significantly higher for the sunitinib group (21%) than for the placebo (8%, p < 0.001) and imatinib (11%, p < 0.05) groups. VEGFR2-targeted ultrasound was able to sensitively differentiate the anti-VEGFR2 effect from the reduced area of tumor with functional flow produced by both anti-angiogenic agents. BR55 molecular imaging was, thus, able both to detect early therapeutic response to sunitinib in CT26 tumors as soon as 24 h after the beginning of the treatment and to provide early discrimination (48 h) between tumor response during anti-angiogenic therapy targeting VEGFR2 expression and response during anti-angiogenic therapy not directly acting on this receptor.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.04.010 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!