Health information technology needs help from primary care researchers.

J Am Board Fam Med

From the Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (AHK, RLP); the Department of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (LAG); the American Board of Family Medicine, Washington, DC (RLP); the Departments of Family Medicine and Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison (JWB); OCHIN, Portland, OR (JED, JP, TB); the Departments of Family Medicine and Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (JED, TB); the Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (MSK); the Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec Canada (JH); and the Department of Family Medicine, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY (CHF).

Published: February 2016

While health information technology (HIT) efforts are beginning to yield measurable clinical benefits, more is needed to meet the needs of patients and clinicians. Primary care researchers are uniquely positioned to inform the evidence-based design and use of technology. Research strategies to ensure success include engaging patient and clinician stakeholders, working with existing practice-based research networks, and using established methods from other fields such as human factors engineering and implementation science. Policies are needed to help support primary care researchers in evaluating and implementing HIT into everyday practice, including expanded research funding, strengthened partnerships with vendors, open access to information systems, and support for the Primary Care Extension Program. Through these efforts, the goal of improved outcomes through HIT can be achieved.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4450103PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2015.03.140246DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

primary care
16
care researchers
12
health technology
8
support primary
8
technology help
4
primary
4
help primary
4
care
4
researchers health
4
technology hit
4

Similar Publications

Importance: A comprehensive lipid panel is recommended by guidelines to evaluate atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk, but uptake is low.

Objective: To evaluate whether direct outreach including bulk orders with and without text messaging increases lipid screening rates.

Design, Setting, And Participants: Pragmatic randomized clinical trial conducted from June 6, 2023, to September 6, 2023, at 2 primary care practices at an academic health system among patients aged 20 to 75 years with at least 1 primary care visit in the past 3 years who were overdue for lipid screening.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Importance: Care management benefits community-dwelling patients with dementia, but studies include few patients with moderate to severe dementia or from racial and ethnic minority populations, lack palliative care, and seldom reduce health care utilization.

Objective: To determine whether integrated dementia palliative care reduces dementia symptoms, caregiver depression and distress, and emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations compared with usual care in moderate to severe dementia.

Design, Setting, And Participants: A randomized clinical trial of community-dwelling patients with moderate to severe dementia and their caregivers enrolled from March 2019 to December 2020 from 2 sites in central Indiana (2-year follow-up completed on January 7, 2023).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Importance: Pediatric obesity and hypertension are highly correlated. To mitigate both conditions, provision of counseling on nutrition, lifestyle, and weight to children with high blood pressure (BP) measurements is recommended.

Objective: To examine racial and ethnic disparities in receipt of nutrition, lifestyle, and weight counseling among patients with high BP at pediatric primary care visits stratified by patients' weight status.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Importance: Limited research explores mental health disparities between individuals in sexual and gender minority (SGM) populations and cisgender heterosexual (non-SGM) populations using national-level data.

Objective: To explore mental health disparities between SGM and non-SGM populations across sexual orientation, sex assigned at birth, and gender identity within the All of Us Research Program.

Design, Setting, And Participants: This cross-sectional study used survey data and linked electronic health records of eligible All of Us Research Program participants from May 31, 2017, to June 30, 2022.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!