Background: All surgical procedures in orthopedics involve the retraction of soft tissue. In this study, the performance of 3 assistants holding the medial retractor during minimally invasive hip arthroplasty was compared with a semiactive retractor holder in a cadaver setup.

Methods: A total of 40 measurements on 3 cadavers were carried out with each subject (3 human, 1 robot) measuring each cadaver 10 times. The retractor was equipped with a sensor array on both sides, to measure variations of the retracting pressures over a 2-minute interval.

Results: The semiactive retractor holder showed an almost constant performance compared with the test subjects. There was no significant reduction of the applied pressure and almost no variation during the 2-minute interval and across all measurements.

Conclusions: The performance of the semiactive retractor holder was more stable than that of a human assistant, making it suitable for intraoperative usage.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1553350615586110DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

semiactive retractor
16
retractor holder
16
soft tissue
8
minimally invasive
8
invasive hip
8
hip arthroplasty
8
retractor
6
retracting soft
4
tissue minimally
4
arthroplasty robotic
4

Similar Publications

Background: All surgical procedures in orthopedics involve the retraction of soft tissue. In this study, the performance of 3 assistants holding the medial retractor during minimally invasive hip arthroplasty was compared with a semiactive retractor holder in a cadaver setup.

Methods: A total of 40 measurements on 3 cadavers were carried out with each subject (3 human, 1 robot) measuring each cadaver 10 times.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!