A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Inspiratory and skeletal muscle strength and endurance and diaphragmatic activation in patients with chronic airflow limitation. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study compared the muscle strength and endurance of inspiratory and limb muscles in patients with chronic airflow limitation and control subjects.
  • Patients showed significantly lower peak inspiratory pressure compared to controls, though some managed normal pressures.
  • While inspiratory muscle endurance was slightly better in patients, limb muscle endurance appeared to be impaired, indicating an adaptive response to respiratory challenges.

Article Abstract

To determine whether patients with chronic airflow limitation have a specific alteration in skeletal muscle performance, the strength and endurance of inspiratory and limb muscles were compared in 11 patients with chronic airflow limitation and 11 control subjects during maximal voluntary contractions. Peak inspiratory pressure at observed functional residual capacity (FRC) was significantly less in the patients than in the control subjects (mean 72 (SD 25) v 93 (21) cm H2O), though only two patients had low maximal pressures across a wide volume range. Maximal voluntary torque of the elbow flexor muscles was also reduced in the patients but the difference was not significant (60 (17) v 72 (18) Nm). During the endurance sequence of 18 maximal voluntary contractions (10 s duration, 5 s rest interval) the decline in peak and average force was less for the inspiratory muscles than for the elbow flexors in both groups. Inspiratory muscle endurance was slightly greater in the patients with chronic airflow limitation than in the control subjects, whereas limb muscle endurance was slightly impaired in the patients. In three patients with chronic airflow limitation, two of whom had low maximal inspiratory pressures at FRC, the ability to drive the diaphragm voluntarily was examined by stimulating the phrenic nerves during maximal inspiratory efforts. Each patient was capable of full activation of the diaphragm during the maximal inspiratory efforts. These results suggest that the relative preservation of inspiratory muscle performance in patients with chronic airflow limitation may be an adaptive response to respiratory "loading."

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC462146PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thx.44.11.903DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patients chronic
24
chronic airflow
24
airflow limitation
24
control subjects
12
maximal voluntary
12
maximal inspiratory
12
patients
10
inspiratory
9
skeletal muscle
8
strength endurance
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!