Implementation and Operational Research: Evaluation of Swaziland's Hub-and-Spoke Model for Decentralizing Access to Antiretroviral Therapy Services.

J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr

*Division of Global HIV/AIDS, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA; †ICAP, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY; ‡Ministry of Health, Government of the Kingdom of Swaziland, Mbabane, Swaziland; and §Division of Global HIV/AIDS, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Mbabane, Swaziland.

Published: May 2015

AI Article Synopsis

  • In 2007, Swaziland adopted a hub-and-spoke model to improve access to antiretroviral therapy (ART) by down-referring stable patients from overloaded central facilities to local clinics (spokes) and allowing ART initiation at these spoke clinics.
  • A study conducted from 2004 to 2010 analyzed the impact of these strategies on patient outcomes, specifically focusing on loss to follow-up (LTFU), death, and overall attrition.
  • The results indicated that down-referral significantly reduced the risk of LTFU and attrition without affecting mortality rates, suggesting that this model could enhance the effectiveness of ART programs in the future.

Article Abstract

Background: In 2007, Swaziland initiated a hub-and-spoke model for decentralizing antiretroviral therapy (ART) access. Decentralization was facilitated through (1) down-referral of stable ART patients from overburdened central facilities (hubs) to primary health care clinics (spokes) and (2) ART initiation at spokes (spoke initiation).

Methods: We conducted a nationally representative retrospective cohort study among adult ART enrollees during 2004-2010 to assess the effect of down-referral and spoke-initiation on rates of loss to follow-up (LTFU), death, and attrition (death or LTFU). Sixteen of 31 hubs were randomly selected using probability-proportional-to-size sampling. Seven selected facilities had initiated the hub-and-spoke model by study start. At these facilities, 1149 of 24,782 hub-initiated and maintained and 878 of 7722 down-referred or spoke-initiated patient records were randomly selected and analyzed. At the 9 hub-only facilities, 483 of 6638 records were randomly selected and analyzed. Multivariable proportional hazards regression was used to assess effect of down-referral (a time-varying covariate) and spoke-initiation on outcomes.

Results: At ART initiation, median age was 35, 65% were female, and median CD4 count was 147 cells per microliter. Controlling for known confounders, down-referral was strongly protective against LTFU [adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) 0.38; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.29 to 0.50] and attrition (AHR = 0.50; 95% CI: 0.34 to 0.76) but not mortality. Compared with hub-initiated and maintained patients, spoke-initiated patients had lower LTFU (AHR 0.59; 95% CI: 0.45 to 0.77) and attrition rates (AHR 0.60; 95% CI: 0.47 to 0.77), but not mortality.

Conclusions: Down-referral and spoke-initiation within a hub-and-spoke ART decentralization model were protective against LTFU and overall attrition and could facilitate future ART program expansion.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000000547DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hub-and-spoke model
12
randomly selected
12
model decentralizing
8
antiretroviral therapy
8
initiated hub-and-spoke
8
art initiation
8
assess down-referral
8
down-referral spoke-initiation
8
hub-initiated maintained
8
records randomly
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!