Importance: The Lariat device has received US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 510(k) clearance for soft-tissue approximation and is being widely used off-label for left atrial appendage (LAA) exclusion. A comprehensive analysis of safety and effectiveness has not been reported.

Objectives: To perform a systematic review of published literature to assess safety and procedural success, defined as successful closure of the LAA during the index procedure, of the Lariat device. We performed a formal analytic review of the FDA MAUDE (Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience) database to compile adverse event reports from real-world practice with the Lariat.

Data Sources: For the systematic review, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library were searched from January 2007 through August 2014 to identify all studies reporting use of the Lariat device in 3 or more patients. The FDA MAUDE database was queried for adverse events reports related to Lariat use.

Data Extractions And Synthesis: Data were abstracted in duplicate by 2 physician reviewers. Events from published literature were pooled using a generic inverse variance weighting with a random effects model. Cumulative and individual adverse events were also reported using the FDA MAUDE data set.

Main Outcomes And Measures: Procedural adverse events and procedural success.

Results: In the systematic review, 5 reports of Lariat device use in 309 participants were identified. Specific complications weighted for inverse of variance of individual studies were urgent need for cardiac surgery (2.3%; 7 of 309 procedures) and death (0.3%; 1 of 309 procedures). Procedural success was 90.3% (279 of 309 procedures). In the FDA MAUDE database, there were 35 unique reports of adverse events with use of the Lariat device. Among these, we identified 5 adverse event reports that noted pericardial effusion and death and an additional 23 reported urgent cardiac surgery without mention of death.

Conclusions And Relevance: This review of published reports and case reports identified risks of adverse events with off-label use of the Lariat device for LAA exclusion. Formal, controlled investigations into the safety and efficacy of the device for this indication are warranted.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.1513DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lariat device
28
fda maude
20
adverse events
20
systematic review
16
procedural success
12
review published
12
maude database
12
309 procedures
12
device
9
safety procedural
8

Similar Publications

Introduction: Over the past decade, left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) has emerged as an established alternative to oral anticoagulation for patients diagnosed with atrial fibrillation (AF). The LARIAT device stands as the sole available epicardial system for complete percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure.

Aim: To present the extended outcomes (spanning over 9 years of observation) in patients with AF who underwent epicardial LAAO.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • * Based on data from the MAUDE database, the LARIAT group experienced significantly more complications, including pericardial effusion (52.9%) and postoperative bleeding (44.1%), compared to AtriClip, which had no reports of pericardial effusion and only 2.7% for bleeding.
  • * The study also found a notable difference in strokes and thrombus instances, with no strokes reported in the LARIAT group versus 18.9% in the AtriClip
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • - Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) helps prevent strokes in patients with atrial fibrillation, but peri-device leak (PDL) might increase the risk of thromboembolic events.
  • - A systematic review of 54,279 patients from 11 studies revealed that PDL significantly raised the odds of experiencing strokes, transient ischemic attacks (TIAs), or systemic embolisms.
  • - Despite the increased risk of thromboembolic events linked to PDL, the study found no significant differences in overall mortality, cardiovascular mortality, or ischemic strokes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Direct current cardioversion practices following percutaneous left atrial appendage closure.

J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol

August 2023

Section of Electrophysiology, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Ross Heart Hospital, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

Introduction: Among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) undergoing direct current cardioversion (DCCV), the need for and use of LAA imaging and oral anticoagulation (OAC) is unclear.

Objective: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the real-world use of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) or cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) before DCCV and use of OAC pre- and post-DCCV in patients with AF status post percutaneous LAAC.

Methods: This retrospective single center study included all patients who underwent DCCV after percutaneous LAAC from 2016 to 2022.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!