Shear bond strength between alumina substrate and prosthodontic resin composites with various adhesive resin systems.

BMC Oral Health

Department of Biomaterials Science and Turku Clinical Biomaterials Centre, Professor and Chair of Biomaterials Science, Director of Turku Clinical Biomaterials Centre - TCBC, Institute of Dentistry, University of Turku and City of Turku, Welfare Division, Turku, Finland.

Published: May 2015

Background: With the increase in demand for cosmetics and esthetics, resin composite restorations and all-ceramic restorations have become an important treatment alternative. Taking into consideration the large number of prosthodontic and adhesive resins currently available, the strength and durability of these materials needs to be evaluated. This laboratory study presents the shear bond strengths of a range of veneering resin composites bonded to all-ceramic core material using different adhesive resins.

Methods: Alumina ceramic specimens (Techceram Ltd, Shipley, UK) were assigned to three groups. Three types of commercially available prosthodontic resin composites [BelleGlass®, (BG, Kerr, CA, USA), Sinfony® (SF, 3 M ESPE, Dental Products, Germany), and GC Gradia® (GCG, GC Corp, Tokyo, Japan)] were bonded to the alumina substrate using four different adhesive resins. Half the specimens per group (N = 40) were stored dry for 24 hours, the remaining were stored for 30 days in water. The bonding strength, so-called shear bond strengths between composite resin and alumina substrate were measured. Data were analysed statistically and variations in bond strength within each group were additionally evaluated by calculating the Weibull modulus.

Results: Bond strengths were influenced by the brand of prosthodontic resin composites. Shear bond strengths of material combinations varied from 24.17 ± 3.72-10.15 ± 3.69 MPa and 21.20 ± 4.64-7.50 ± 4.22 at 24 h and 30 days, respectively. BG resin composite compared with the other resin composites provided the strongest bond with alumina substrate (p < 0.01). SF resin composite was found to have a lower bond strength than the other composites. The Weibull moduli were highest for BG, which was bonded by using Optibond Solo Plus adhesive resin at 24 h and 30 days. There was no effect of storage time and adhesive brand on bond strength.

Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, the shear bond strengths of composite resins to alumina substrate are related to the composite resins.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4436791PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-015-0041-7DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

shear bond
20
alumina substrate
20
resin composites
20
bond strengths
20
bond strength
12
prosthodontic resin
12
resin composite
12
resin
11
bond
9
adhesive resin
8

Similar Publications

Effect of Mushroom, Ozone Gas, and Their Combination as Pretreatment Materials on the Bond Strength of Resin Composite to Dentin.

J Contemp Dent Pract

October 2024

Department of Dental Biomaterials, Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt, Orcid: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3420-4146.

Aim: To assess the effect of mushrooms, ozone gas, and their combination as cavity disinfectants on the bonding strength of composite to dentin.

Materials And Methods: The study was conducted on 40 sound premolar teeth randomly divided into four groups. Group I: control group, Group II: mushroom group, Group III: Ozone group, and Group IV: mushroom + ozone gas (combination) group.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of stereolithography (SLA), digital light processing (DLP) manufactured, and computer numerical control (CNC) milled zirconia to veneering ceramic.

Materials And Methods: Rectangular shaped zirconia substrates (10 × 5 × 5 mm) were manufactured through SLA, DLP, and CNC technology separately. Their surface roughness was measured and the surface topography was analyzed by atomic force microscope (AFM).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This research aimed to assess the shear bond strength (SBS) of metal brackets bonded to composite veneers using different surface preparations. One-hundred composite disks were divided into 10 different groups whereby each group combines a surface preparation (roughening or no roughening), etching agent (37% phosphoric or 9.5% hydrofluoric acid), adhesive protocol (self-etch or total-etch), and bonding agent (with or without G-Premio Bond).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Effect of Different Working Settings of Sandblasting on Resin Composite Repair Bond Strength.

Materials (Basel)

January 2025

Department of Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Cariology, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.

To investigate the effect of different sandblasting settings on the shear bond strength (SBS) in the repair of resin composite, specimens (resin composite, enamel, and dentin; each group = 16) were sandblasted by varying the parameters of air pressure (0.2/0.3/0.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Two 3D-printed crown materials (Crown and Ceramic Crown) were examined to determine the best surface treatment and primers for bonding. Discs of the two materials were printed and mounted with their "intaglio" surfaces untouched. Half the specimens from each group were sandblasted with 50 µm alumina.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!