A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The TACTIC: development and validation of the Tool for Assessing Chest Tube Insertion Competency. | LitMetric

The TACTIC: development and validation of the Tool for Assessing Chest Tube Insertion Competency.

CJEM

5KidSIM-Aspire Simulation Research Program,Section of Emergency Medicine,Alberta Children's Hospital, University of Calgary,Calgary,AB.

Published: March 2015

Objectives: Pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physicians receive little opportunity to practice and perform chest tube insertion. We sought to develop and validate a scoring tool to assess chest tube insertion competency and identify areas where training is required for PEM physicians.

Methods: We developed a 40-point, 20-item (scored 0, 1, or 2) assessment tool entitled the Tool for Assessing Chest Tube Insertion Competency (TACTIC) and studied how PEM physicians and fellows scored when inserting a chest tube into a pork rib model. Participants were scored at baseline and compared to themselves after receiving targeted training using Web-based animations and presentations followed by expert instruction and practice on chest tube insertion task trainers. All insertions were video recorded and reviewed by two blinded reviewers. Eight common videos were reviewed to assess interrater reliability.

Results: The TACTIC demonstrated good interrater reliability with an r 2 =0.86. Our cohort demonstrated a significant improvement in TACTIC scores by taking part in targeted training (precourse TACTIC=65%, 95% CI 54-76 v. postcourse TACTIC=84%, 95% CI 80-88), highlighting the construct validity of the TACTIC. Individual participants increased their TACTIC scores by an average of 17%.

Conclusions: The TACTIC demonstrates good interrater reliability, content validity, and construct validity in assessing a PEM practitioner's skill inserting chest tubes in a simulated setting.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.2310/8000.2014.141406DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

chest tube
24
tube insertion
20
insertion competency
12
tool assessing
8
assessing chest
8
pem physicians
8
inserting chest
8
targeted training
8
good interrater
8
interrater reliability
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!