Cortical Suspensory Button Versus Aperture Interference Screw Fixation for Knee Anterior Cruciate Ligament Soft-Tissue Allograft: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Arthroscopy

Columbia Orthopaedic Group, Columbia, Missouri, U.S.A.; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, U.S.A.

Published: September 2015

Purpose: To compare anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) soft-tissue allograft reconstruction using suspensory versus aperture fixation.

Methods: After we performed prospective power analysis and obtained institutional review board approval, as well as patient consent, 64 patients were block randomized among 3 study sites to the aperture fixation group or suspensory fixation group. All patients underwent all-inside ACL reconstruction with soft-tissue allograft using either (1) femoral and tibial joint-line fixation with a femoral cannulated interference screw and a tibial cannulated interference retrograde screw (aperture) or (2) femoral and tibial cortical buttons (suspensory). Our primary outcome measure was knee anteroposterior (AP) stability measured using the KT-1000 device (MEDmetric, San Diego, CA). Secondary outcome measures included change in pain score on a visual analog scale versus preoperatively, narcotic consumption, International Knee Documentation Committee knee examination rating, International Knee Documentation Committee subjective evaluation score, Knee Society Scores, Short Form 12 scores, and radiographic analysis for socket widening.

Results: Ultimately, 6 included patients (9%) were not treated (cancelled surgery), and at 2 years' follow-up, 43 treated patients (74%) completed clinical evaluation. The primary outcome measure, instrumented knee AP stability at 25° of knee flexion, showed no difference between groups (P = .61) at 24 months' follow-up. In addition, no statistically significant difference between groups was observed for secondary measures.

Conclusions: Our results show no significant differences in knee AP stability or other outcomes comparing all-inside ACL allograft reconstruction using aperture fixation and all-inside ACL allograft reconstruction using suspensory fixation.

Level Of Evidence: Level II, lesser-quality randomized controlled trial with follow-up of less than 80% at 2 years.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2015.03.006DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

soft-tissue allograft
12
allograft reconstruction
12
all-inside acl
12
knee
9
versus aperture
8
interference screw
8
anterior cruciate
8
cruciate ligament
8
randomized controlled
8
controlled trial
8

Similar Publications

Revision Triceps Reconstruction With Achilles Bone Block Allograft Augmentation: A Novel Inlay Technique.

Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg

January 2025

Department of Orthopaedics, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Central Virginia Veteran Affairs Health Care System, Richmond, VA.

Managing rerupture of the triceps brachii tendon after surgical repair is challenging due to poor tissue quality, retraction, and adhesions. This clinical scenario often requires augmentation with native tissue or tendon allografts. Traditional techniques include V-Y advancement, reinforced triceps advancement with double row or suture bridge fixation, and allograft tendon augmentation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: While allografts are commonly used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), evidence to guide specific allograft selection is lacking.

Purpose: To compare clinical and graft failure rates after ACLR using soft tissue-only allografts and bone-soft tissue allografts in adults.

Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Tooth extraction initiates a cascade of homeostatic and structural modifications within the periodontal tissues, culminating in alveolar ridge resorption. To prevent ridge resorption following extraction and facilitate successful placement of an implant-supported prosthesis, alveolar ridge preservation was performed.

Methods: In this study, the biocompatibility of a nanocomposite consisting of self-assembling peptide nanofibers (organic phase) and tri-calcium phosphate-nano hydroxyapatite (mineral phase), was evaluated in rabbits.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: For complete disruption of the posterolateral corner (PLC) structures, operative treatment is most commonly advocated, as nonoperative treatment has higher rates of persistent lateral laxity and posttraumatic arthritis. Some studies have shown that acute direct repair results in revision rates upwards of 37% to 40% compared with 6% to 9% for initial reconstruction. In a recent study assessing the outcomes of acute repair of PLC avulsion injuries with 2 to 7 years of follow-up, patients with adequate tissue were shown to have a much lower failure rate than previously documented.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Graft Options.

Arthroscopy

January 2025

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwell, New Hyde Park, New York, U.S.A.; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery at Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, New York, U.S.A.; Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York, U.S.A.. Electronic address:

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is one of the most common orthopaedic sports medicine surgeries. Its prevalence in the sports medicine sphere is matched by the numerous options of different techniques. Chief among these is graft selection, which most commonly falls into 1 of 4 options: bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autograft, hamstring tendon autograft (HT), quadriceps tendon autograft, and allografts.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!