Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Diabetes mellitus (DM) might increase the risk of urolithiasis, but the results were inconsistent. Hence, we conducted a meta-analysis to assess the association between DM and the risk of urolithiasis. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library to identify the relevant observational studies up to November 2014. Reference lists of retrieved articles were also reviewed. Summary relative risks (RRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to estimate the association between DM and the risk of urolithiasis. We identified 3 case-control studies and 4 cohort studies regarding DM and the risk of urolithiasis, involving 247,531 participants. Analyses of all studies showed that DM was associated with an increased risk of urolithiasis (RR=1.24, 95% CI: 1.14-1.35). There was heterogeneity among studies (p=0.027, I2=57.9%). The association between DM and the risk of urolithiasis was not significantly differed by gender, but this association was inconsistent in the North American and Asian populations. When restricting the analysis to studies that had adjusted for body mass index (n=2) or hypertension (n=3), the RRs were 1.46 (95% CI: 1.03-2.06) and 1.22 (95% CI: 1.01-1.48), respectively. There was no significant publication bias (p=0.96 for Egger's regression asymmetry test). Our study provided evidence that there was a significant direct association of DM and the risk of urolithiasis. However, this finding was based on the observational studies, and more well-designed randomized controlled trials were needed.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00240-015-0773-5 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!