https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/efetch.fcgi?db=pubmed&id=25894532&retmode=xml&tool=Litmetric&email=readroberts32@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09 258945322016011320201217
1932-62031042015PloS onePLoS OneComparison of the association of sac growth and coil compaction with recurrence in coil embolized cerebral aneurysms.e0123017e0123017e012301710.1371/journal.pone.0123017In recurrent cerebral aneurysms treated by coil embolization, coil compaction is regarded as the presumptive mechanism. We test the hypothesis that aneurysm growth is the primary recurrence mechanism. We also test the hypothesis that the coil mass will translate a measurable extent when recurrence occurs.An objective, quantitative image analysis protocol was developed to determine the volumes of aneurysms and coil masses during initial and follow-up visits from 3D rotational angiograms. The population consisted of 15 recurrence and 12 non-recurrence control aneurysms initially completely coiled at a single center. An investigator sensitivity study was performed to assess the objectivity of the methods. Paired Wilcoxon tests (p<0.05, one-tailed) were performed to assess for aneurysm and coil growth. The translation of the coil mass center at follow-up was computed. A Mann Whitney U-Test (p<0.05, one-tailed) was used to compare translation of coil mass centers between recurrence and control subjects.Image analysis protocol was found to be insensitive to the investigator. Aneurysm growth was evident in the recurrence cohort (p=0.003) but not the control (p=0.136). There was no evidence of coil compaction in either the recurrence or control cohorts (recurrence: p=0.339; control: p=0.429). The translation of the coil mass centers was found to be significantly larger in the recurrence cohort than the control cohort (p=0.047).Aneurysm sac growth, not coil compaction, was the primary mechanism of recurrence following successful coil embolization. The coil mass likely translates to a measurable extent when recurrence occurs and has the potential to serve as a non-angiographic recurrence marker.HoppeAnna LALDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, United States of America.RaghavanMadhavan LMLDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, United States of America.HasanDavid MDMDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, United States of America.engR01 HL083475HLNHLBI NIH HHSUnited StatesR03 NS079227NSNINDS NIH HHSUnited StatesR03NS079227-01A1NSNINDS NIH HHSUnited StatesK08NS082363-01A1NSNINDS NIH HHSUnited StatesK08 NS082363NSNINDS NIH HHSUnited StatesR01HL083475HLNHLBI NIH HHSUnited StatesComparative StudyJournal ArticleResearch Support, N.I.H., Extramural20150420
United StatesPLoS One1012850811932-6203IMAdolescentAdultAgedCase-Control StudiesCohort StudiesDemographyEmbolization, TherapeuticFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedIntracranial AneurysmpathologytherapyMaleMiddle AgedRecurrenceYoung AdultCompeting Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
2014102320152262015421602015422602016114602015420epublish25894532PMC440409110.1371/journal.pone.0123017PONE-D-14-47373Byrne J, Sohn M-J, Molyneux A. Five Year Experience in Using Coil Embolization for Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: Outcomes and Incidence of Late Rebleeding. J Neurosurg. 1999;90:656–63.10193610Kang H-S, Han MH, Kwon BJ, Kwon O-K, Kim SH. Repeat Endovascular Treatment in Post-Embolization Recurrent Intracranial Aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2006;58:60–70.16385330Sluzewski M, Van Rooij W, Slob M, Bescos J, Slump C, Wijnalda D. Relation Between Aneurysm Volume, Packing, and Compaction in 145 Aneurysms Treated with Coils. Radiology. 2004;(231):653–8.15118115Raymond J, Guilbert F, Weill A, Georganos S, Juravsky L, Lambert A, et al. Long-term Angiographic Recurrences After Selective Endovascular Treatment of Aneurysms with Detachable Coils. Stroke. 2003;34:1398–403.12775880Murayama Y, Nien YL, Duckwiler G, Gobin P, Jahan R, Frazee J, et al. Guglielmi Detachable Coil Embolization of Cerebral Aneurysms: 11 Years' Experience. J Neurosurg. 2003;98:959–66.12744354Bavinzski G, Talazoglu V, Killer M, Richling B, Gruber A, Gross C, et al. Gross and Microscopic Histopathological Findings in Aneurysms of the Human Brain Treated with Guglielmi Detachable Coils. J Neurosurg. 1999;91:284–93.10433317Gallas S, Pasco A, Cottier J-P, Gabrillargues J, Drouineau J, Cognard C. A Multicenter Study of 705 Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Treated with Guglielmi Detachable Coils. Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26:1723–31.PMC797513816091521Mericle R, Wakhloo A, Lopes D, Lanzino G, Guterman L, Hopkins N. Delayed Aneurysm Regrowth and Recanalization After Guglielmi Detachable Coil Treatment. J Neurosurg. 1998;89:142–5.9647186Hasan D, Nadareyshvili A, Hoppe A, Mahaney K, Kung D, Raghavan M. Cerebral Aneurysm Sac Growth as the Etiology of Recurrence After Successful Coil Embolization. Stroke. 2012;43:866–8. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.63782710.1161/STROKEAHA.111.637827PMC347295422180247De Craene M, Pozo J, Villa M, Vivas E, Sola T, Guimaraens L, et al., editors. Coil Compaction and Aneurysm Growth: Image-Based Quantification using Non-rigid Registration. SPIE, Medical Imaging 2008: Computer-Aided Diagnosis; 2008.Hwang GJ, Berenstein A, Niimi Y, Setton A, Pryor J, Baltsavias G, et al. The Accuracy of Plain Skull X-Ray Examination as a Predictor of Recanalization Following Guglielmi Detachable Coil Embolisation in the Treatment of Cerebral Aneurysms. Interventional Neuroradiology. 2000;6:195–202.PMC367967720667198Otsu N. A Threshold Selection Method From Gray-Level Histograms. Automatica. 1975;11(23):62–6.Osher S, Sethian J. Fronts Propagating with Curvature-Dependent Speed: Algorithms Based on Hamilton-Jacobi Formulations. J Comput Physics. 1988;79:12–49.Lorensen W, Cline H, editors. Marching Cubes: A High Resolution 3D Surface Construction Algorithm. 14th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques; 1987.Ford M, Hoi Y, Piccinelli M, Antiga L, Steinman D. An Objective Approach to the Digital Removal of Saccular Aneurysms: Techniques and Applications. Br J Radiol. 2009;82:S55–S61. 10.1259/bjr/6759372710.1259/bjr/6759372720348537Abdihalim M, Watanabe M, Chaudhry S, Jagadeesan B, Suri MF, Qureshi A. Are Coil Compaction and Aneurysmal Growth Two Distinct Etiologies Leading to Recurrence Following Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysm? J Neuroimaging. 2014;24(2):171–5. 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2012.00786.x10.1111/j.1552-6569.2012.00786.x23317437