Aim: To rationally evaluate the effect of S-1 vs capecitabine for the treatment of gastric cancer.
Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Google Scholar, and China Journal Full Text Database were accessed to collect clinical randomized controlled trials regarding the effect of S-1 vs capecitabine for the treatment of gastric cancer patients. Statistical analysis was performed by meta-analysis. Four randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria.
Results: Compared with capecitabine regimens, the 1-year survival rate in gastric cancer patients was 0.80 (95%CI: 0.52-1.21, P = 0.29). The overall response rate of S-1 vs capecitabine was 0.94 (95%CI: 0.59-1.51, P = 0.93). Compared with capecitabine regimens, the most frequent hematologic toxicities were neutropenia (OR = 0.99, 95%CI: 0.65-1.49, P = 0.94) and thrombocytopenia (OR = 0.72, 95%CI: 0.31-1.67, P = 0.44). The most frequent non-hematologic toxicities included nausea (OR = 0.85, 95%CI: 0.56-1.28, P = 0.43) and hand-foot syndrome (OR = 0.16, 95%CI: 0.10-0.27, P < 0.00001).
Conclusion: The existing studies suggest that S-1 is not more effective than capecitabine in the treatment of gastric cancer patients, but does exhibit less toxicity with regard to hand-foot syndrome.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4394098 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i14.4358 | DOI Listing |
Mol Clin Oncol
January 2025
Department of Oncology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, P.R. China.
Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) negative advanced gastric cancer (GC) has a high global incidence and mortality rate with limited options for second-line treatment. Monotherapy is not effective and the combination of chemotherapy and immunotherapy has not yet been included in the guidelines. The present study aimed to explore a new treatment approach by conducting a single-center, retrospective, observational real-world study.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTherapie
October 2024
Department of Medical and Clinical Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Centre of PharmacoVigilance and Pharmacoepidemiology, Toulouse University Hospital, 31000 Toulouse, France. Electronic address:
Objectives: Fluoropyrimidine-based therapies, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and its oral prodrugs, capecitabine and tegafur/oteracil/gimeracil (S-1), are pivotal drugs to treat gastric cancer. Fluoropyrimidines are associated with cardiotoxicity including ischemic cardiopathy. The mechanisms of ischemic cardiopathy are considered to be multifactorial, potentially involving metabolites of 5-FU generated by the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSci Rep
September 2024
Department of Oncology and General Medicine, IMSUT Hospital, Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol
August 2024
Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Youyi Road, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400016, China.
Objective: Maintenance therapy following first-line chemotherapy is of particular significance in patients diagnosed with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). We conducted a meta-analysis to investigate the impact of maintenance therapy (MT) on the survival prognosis of individuals with recurrent or metastatic NPC.
Methods: The databases Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library were thoroughly searched in a comprehensive manner.
Jpn J Clin Oncol
October 2024
Department of Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!