Evaluation of bone formation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy using different fixation materials.

J Craniomaxillofac Surg

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Division of Clinical Medicine, Graduate Faculty of Interdisciplinary Research, University of Yamanashi, 1110, Shimokato, Chuoshi 409-3821, Japan.

Published: June 2015

AI Article Synopsis

  • This study aimed to assess how different fixation materials affect bone changes after sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO).
  • The research involved 74 patients who were categorized into five groups based on the type of fixation used, including both titanium and various absorbable plates.
  • Findings indicated significant differences in certain bone parameters over time, suggesting that the choice of fixation materials impacts bone healing after the procedure.

Article Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate bony change between the proximal and distal segments after sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) using different fixation materials.

Subjects And Methods: The subjects consisted of 74 patients (21 male and 53 female; 148 sides) who underwent SSRO with and without Le Fort I osteotomy. They were divided into five groups: (1) an MT group, mono-cortical titanium plate fixation (26 sides); (2) an MA group, mono-cortical absorbable plate fixation (48 sides); (3) a BA group, bi-cortical absorbable plate fixation (22 sides); (4) an MAα group, mono-cortical plate absorbable fixation with α-tricalcium phosphate (36 sides); and (5) a BAα group, bi-cortical plate absorbable fixation with α-tricalcium phosphate (16 sides). Ramus square (RmS), ramus width (RmM-RmL) and ramus length (RmA-RmP) at the horizontal plane under the mandibular foramen were assessed pre-operatively, immediately after surgery, and at 1 year after surgery by computed tomography (CT).

Results: There were significant differences among the groups regarding change over time in RmS (p = 0.0126) and RmM-RmL (p = 0.0001). However, there was no significant difference among the groups regarding change over time in RmA-RmP.

Conclusion: These results suggest that the use of different fixation materials leads to significant differences in the bone healing process after SSRO.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2015.03.009DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

group mono-cortical
12
plate fixation
12
fixation sides
12
sagittal split
8
split ramus
8
ramus osteotomy
8
fixation
8
fixation materials
8
sides group
8
absorbable plate
8

Similar Publications

Comparison of five methods for locked-plate fixation of complex diaphyseal fractures.

Orthop Traumatol Surg Res

November 2022

Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique et de Traumatologie, Hôpital de Hautepierre, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, 1 avenue Molière, 67098 Strasbourg cedex, France; Laboratoire ICube, Université de Strasbourg- CNRS, 2 rue Boussingault, 67000 Strasbourg, France. Electronic address:

Background: Peri-prosthetic fractures (PPFs) are steadily rising in number due to population ageing and increased performance of joint replacement procedures. Although PPFs without implant loosening are usually managed by internal fixation, no consensus exists regarding the optimal construct. The primary objective of this study was to compare five constructs, and the secondary objective was to compare sub-groups of mono-cortical screw constructs, with the goal of identifying the method most appropriate for diaphyseal fracture fixation when prosthetic material is present within the intra-medullary canal.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Evaluation of internal fixation techniques for extracapsular fracture: A finite element analysis and comparison.

Comput Methods Programs Biomed

October 2022

Department of Oral Surgery, Ninth People's Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology and Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, No. 639 Zhi Zao Ju Road, Shanghai 200011, China. Electronic address:

Background And Objectives: This study explored the optimal plates and screws fixation for extracapsular fracture by finite element analysis, and provided a biomechanical basis for clinical treatment.

Methods: Four extracapsular fixation models were built and evaluated: A. One single straight four-hole plate with two bi-cortical screws on both sides and two mono-cortical screws in the middle; B.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Regeneration of large jaw bone defects still remains a clinical challenge. To avoid incomplete bone repair, bone grafts have been advocated to support the healing process. This study comparatively evaluated new bone formation among a synthetic graft substitute, a human bone derivative, and a bovine xenograft.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To investigate the feasibility of placing bi-cortical cortex (B-cort) or mono-cortical locking screws (M-lock) in a plate-rod construct applied to the feline tibia in combination with different intramedullary (IM) pins.

Methods: Twenty-four feline tibiae of cats were divided into 4 groups, corresponding to IM pin sizes filling approximately 30% (1.0 mm), 40% (1.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Comparison of skeletal stability after sagittal split ramus osteotomy among mono-cortical plate fixation, bi-cortical plate fixation, and hybrid fixation using absorbable plates and screws.

J Craniomaxillofac Surg

February 2017

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Head: Prof. Dr. K Ueki), Division of Medicine, Interdisciplinary Graduate School, University of Yamanashi, 1110 Shimokato, Chuo-shi, Yamanashi, 409-3898, Japan.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine skeletal stability and plate breakage after sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) with the mono-cortical plate fixation, bi-cortical plate fixation, and hybrid fixation techniques using absorbable plates and screws.

Materials And Methods: A total of 76 Japanese patients diagnosed with mandibular prognathism with and without maxillary deformity were divided into 3 groups randomly. A total of 28 patients underwent SSRO with mono-cortical plate fixation, 23 underwent SSRO with bi-cortical plate fixation, and 25 underwent SSRO with hybrid fixation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!