Background: A number of jurisdictions have used regulation to promote the adoption of safety-engineered needles as a primary solution to reduce the risk of needlestick injuries among healthcare workers. Regulatory change has not been complemented by ongoing efforts to monitor needlestick injury trends which limits opportunities to evaluate the need for additional investment in this area. The objective of this study was to describe trends in the incidence of needlestick injuries in Ontario prior to and following the establishment of regulation to promote the adoption of safety-engineered needles.

Methods: An observational study of needlestick injuries obtained from two independent administrative data sources (emergency department records for the treatment of work-related disorders and workers' compensation claims) for a population of occupationally-active adults over the period 2004-2012.

Results: Comparing the year prior to the regulation being established (2006) to three years after the regulation came into effect (2011), needlestick injury rates in the health and social services sector that were captured by workers' compensation claims declined by 31% and by 43% in the work-related emergency department records. Rates of workers' compensation claims associated with needlestick injuries declined by 31% in the hospital sector, by 67% in the long-term care sector and have increased by approximately 1% in nursing services over the period 2004-2012.

Conclusions: Two independent administrative data sources documented an overall reduction in needlestick injuries in the province of Ontario following a regulatory requirement to adopt safety-engineered needles; however, a substantial burden of occupational needlestick injuries persists in this setting.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4393628PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0798-zDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

needlestick injuries
24
needlestick injury
12
workers' compensation
12
compensation claims
12
regulatory change
8
observational study
8
regulation promote
8
promote adoption
8
adoption safety-engineered
8
safety-engineered needles
8

Similar Publications

Background: Needle stick injury (NSI) is one of the most common and severe occupational hazards for healthcare workers (HCWs), leading to both physical harm and psychological distress and ultimately affecting patient safety. Previous studies on NSI were predominantly focused on general clinical practice, and limited research has targeted specifical NSI occurring in acupuncture practice in China, which has the greatest use of acupuncture.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate NSI and associated factors among acupuncture practitioners in China.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: This systematic review evaluates occupational health within the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries, focusing on ergonomic, physical, chemical, and biological hazards. It identifies significant impacts of these hazards across various professions and underscores the highlights for region-specific strategies and further research.

Methods: A comprehensive search in Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science databases until October 2023 targeted occupational health studies in the GCC, adhering to PRISMA guidelines and NIH Quality Assessment Tools.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Original Research: Exploring the Use of Passive vs. Active Insulin Safety Pen Needle Devices in a Pediatric Population: A Feasibility Study.

Am J Nurs

January 2025

Brenna Frankish is the clinical learning programs coordinator at Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, where Kristina Amplo is the campus education coordinator and Christina Calamaro is the director of nursing research and evidence-based practice for nursing and allied health. Rachael Townsend is the pediatric program manager at Wellstar Health System in Marietta, GA. Tonya Miller-Roberts is a clinical psychologist at the Atlanta VA Medical Center in Decatur, GA. Akane Fujimoto Wakabayashi is a graduate research assistant at the Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta. This study was supported through funding from Owen Mumford, Ltd, which also supplied the active safety pen needle devices used. Contact author: Brenna Frankish, . The authors have disclosed no potential conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise.

Background: Insulin pens are the mainstay of insulin delivery in the pediatric population, especially among patients unable to use an insulin pump. Safety pen needle (SPN) devices have been embraced by both nurses and patients because they limit the risks of needlestick injury and exposure to blood-borne pathogens. With the commonly used traditional passive SPN device, however, it can be difficult to observe that the dose has been accurately or fully administered.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Operating room (OR) personnel are at a high risk for sharp injuries, which can cause serious side effects. The goals of this study are to analyze OR nurses and surgical technologists' experiences and their current level of sharps education. An anonymous survey was sent to a single institution asking whether the participants have been stuck by a sharp, when they were stuck, and their perspective on sharp safety.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!