The Relationship between Parameters of Long-Latency Evoked Potentials in a Multisensory Design.

Clin EEG Neurosci

Centro de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Cuerpo Académico Biomedicina, Universidad Autónoma de Campeche, Campeche, México.

Published: October 2016

In previous papers, we have shown that parameters of the omitted stimulus potential (OSP), which occurs at the end of a train of sensory stimuli, strongly depend on the modality. A train of stimuli also produces long-latency evoked potentials (LLEP) at the beginning of the train. This study is an extension of the OSP research, and it tested the relationship between parameters (ie, rate of rise, amplitude, and peak latency) of the P2 waves when trains of auditory, visual, or somatosensory stimuli were applied. The dynamics of the first 3 potentials in the train, related to habituation, were also studied. Twenty healthy young college volunteers participated in the study. As in the OSP, the P2 was faster and higher for auditory than for visual or somatosensory stimuli. The first P2 was swifter and higher than the second and the third potentials. The strength of habituation depends on the sensory modality and the parameter used. All these findings support the view that many long-latency brain potentials could share neural mechanisms related to wave generation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1550059413518502DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

relationship parameters
8
long-latency evoked
8
evoked potentials
8
auditory visual
8
visual somatosensory
8
somatosensory stimuli
8
potentials
5
parameters long-latency
4
potentials multisensory
4
multisensory design
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!