A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block and rectus sheath block in laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study evaluated the effectiveness of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) and rectus sheath (RS) blocks in providing pain relief after laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery versus no blocks.
  • Patients who received the nerve blocks (Block(+) group) experienced significantly shorter hospital stays (1.56 days) and higher rates of day surgery (11 patients) compared to those who didn’t receive the blocks (Block(-) group, 2.07 days and 1 patient).
  • Additionally, the Block(+) group reported better postoperative pain control, indicating that TAP and RS blocks may enhance recovery after surgery.

Article Abstract

We aimed to assess the efficacy of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and rectus sheath (RS) block in patients undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery. Few studies have addressed the efficacy and safety associated with TAP block and RS block for laparoscopic surgery. Thirty-two patients underwent laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery, either with TAP and RS block (Block(+) group, n = 18) or without peripheral nerve block (Block(-) group, n = 14). Preoperatively, TAP and RS block were performed through ultrasound guidance. We evaluated postoperative pain control and patient outcomes. The mean postoperative hospital stays were 1.56 days (Block+ group) and 2.07 days (Block(-) group; range, 1-3 days in both groups; P = 0.0038). A total of 11 patients and 1 patient underwent day surgery in the Block(+) and Block(-) groups, respectively (P = 0.0012). Good postoperative pain control was more commonly observed in the Block(+) group than in the Block(-) group (P = 0.011). TAP and RS block was effective in reducing postoperative pain and was associated with a fast recovery in patients undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4400936PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.9738/INTSURG-D-14-00193.1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

tap block
20
laparoscopic inguinal
16
inguinal hernia
16
hernia surgery
16
block+ group
12
block- group
12
postoperative pain
12
block
10
efficacy transversus
8
transversus abdominis
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!