AI Article Synopsis

  • Acute pulmonary embolism significantly contributes to illness and mortality, and surgical pulmonary embolectomy is recommended for patients who are hypotensive.
  • A study analyzed 96 cases from 2003 to 2011 and found a 30-day mortality rate of 4.2%, with most patients recovering well.
  • Patients with severe right ventricular dysfunction who were stable had a low mortality rate of 1.4% and shorter hospital stays compared to unstable patients, suggesting the procedure can be effective but requires careful patient evaluation.

Article Abstract

Acute pulmonary embolism is a substantial cause of morbidity and death. Although the American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines recommend surgical pulmonary embolectomy in patients with acute pulmonary embolism associated with hypotension, there are few reports of 30-day mortality rates. We performed a retrospective review of acute pulmonary embolectomy procedures performed in 96 consecutive patients who had severe, globally hypokinetic right ventricular dysfunction as determined by transthoracic echocardiography. Data on patients who were treated from January 2003 through December 2011 were derived from health system databases of the New York State Cardiac Surgery Reporting System and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. The data represent procedures performed at 3 tertiary care facilities within a large health system operating in the New York City metropolitan area. The overall 30-day mortality rate was 4.2%. Most patients (68 [73.9%]) were discharged home or to rehabilitation facilities (23 [25%]). Hemodynamically stable patients with severe, globally hypokinetic right ventricular dysfunction had a 30-day mortality rate of 1.4%, with a postoperative mean length of stay of 9.1 days. Comparable findings for hemodynamically unstable patients were 12.5% and 13.4 days, respectively. Acute pulmonary embolectomy can be a viable procedure for patients with severe, globally hypokinetic right ventricular dysfunction, with or without hemodynamic compromise; however, caution is warranted. Our outcomes might be dependent upon institutional capability, experience, surgical ability, and careful patient selection.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4378038PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.14503/THIJ-13-3877DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pulmonary embolectomy
16
acute pulmonary
16
30-day mortality
12
patients severe
12
severe globally
12
globally hypokinetic
12
hypokinetic ventricular
12
ventricular dysfunction
12
surgical pulmonary
8
pulmonary embolism
8

Similar Publications

The mediastinal vasculature can be affected by various etiologies in cancer patients. Both direct and indirect sequela of cancer may result in life-threatening clinical presentations. Tumor growth may cause vessel narrowing and decreased blood flow from either extrinsic mass effect, invasion into the vascular wall, or tumor thrombus within the lumen.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Percutaneous mechanical aspiration thrombectomy is increasingly being employed as a less invasive alternative for managing right heart masses, including clot in transit.

Aims: We aimed to analyze trends in the use of catheter-directed aspiration (CDA) for right heart masses. Additionally, we analyzed in-hospital outcomes of percutaneous versus surgical approaches for patients with CIT and PE.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is the third most frequent cause of acute cardiovascular presentation after myocardial infarction and stroke. The treatment approach for PE consists of hemodynamic and respiratory support, anticoagulation, reperfusion treatment, and vena cava filters. Reperfusion treatment consists of systemic thrombolysis (recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator, streptokinase, and urokinase); percutaneous catheter-directed therapy (CDT); and surgical embolectomy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Interhospital transfer (IHT) for acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is increasingly performed to improve access to advanced reperfusion therapies. It is unclear if outcomes of patients undergoing IHT are comparable with those of patients presenting in-house to hospitals with PE Response Team (PERT) capabilities.

Objectives: To determine whether outcomes of patients with acute PE undergoing IHT differ from those of patients presenting in-house.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!