AI Article Synopsis

  • The circular-stapled anastomosis (CSA) technique for gastrojejunostomy in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) has a higher incidence of non-life-threatening complications compared to the hand-sewn anastomosis (HSA) technique.
  • Most complications were observed shortly after surgery, with greater rates of marginal ulcers and stenosis in patients who underwent CSA.
  • Despite the differences in complication rates and longer surgical times for HSA, both techniques resulted in similar weight loss outcomes over 12 months.

Article Abstract

Background: Various surgical techniques exist to create the gastrojejunostomy during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypasses (LRYGB). A hand-sewn anastomosis (HSA) and circular-stapled anastomosis (CSA) are both common techniques. We hypothesized that the CSA was associated with a greater incidence of anastomotic complications. As a secondary aim, we sought to determine if weight loss varied by technique.

Methods: This study is a retrospective review of patients who underwent primary LRYGB at the Medical College of Wisconsin from January 2010 to December 2011. Procedures were performed by one of 2 surgeons, each with a preferred gastrojejunostomy technique. Clinical information and patient outcomes were followed up to one year.

Results: A total of 190 patients underwent LRYGB during the study interval. The majority of patients underwent HSA. Forty-one of 190 (21.6%) patients experienced one or more complications. Most complications were Clavien Classification Grade III and were experienced within 30 days of surgery in 3 (2.2%) HSA patients and 6 (10.9%) CSA patients (P = .02). Anastomotic complications occurred more frequently with the CSA technique (marginal ulcer 5.5% CSA versus .7% HSA; P = .04 and stenosis 16.4% CSA versus 3% HSA; P = .01). There were no gastrojejunostomy leaks in this series. Operative time was significantly longer in HSA patients (204 minutes HSA versus 166 minutes CSA; P<.01), but length of hospital stay did not differ. Weight loss at 12 months was similar between techniques (69.4% percent excess BMI lost (EBMIL) HSA versus 76.6% EBMIL CSA; P = .11). No patients were lost to follow-up at 30 days. Thirty-five patients (19%) were lost to follow-up by one year.

Conclusion: The CSA technique of gastrojejunostomy in gastric bypass is associated with a higher rate of nonlife threatening anastomotic complications than the HSA technique. Operative times are significantly longer for HSA, but length of hospital stay (LOS) and long-term weight loss are equivalent.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2014.11.029DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

anastomotic complications
12
patients underwent
12
gastrojejunostomy technique
8
hsa patients
8
csa versus
8
versus hsa
8
hsa
7
csa
7
patients
7
complications
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!