This article provides an overview of the theoretical and practical issues surrounding the use of earprints in forensic research. In the first section, we provide a limited account of the history of earprints in forensic investigations and their use as evidence in court. Criticism of the use of earprints for individualization is addressed and fundamental questions that require attention are summarized. In the second section, we summarize the results of various studies that we have performed on earprint variation. Potential causes of intraindividual variation in earprint appearance are, for instance, variations in the way the prints are lifted, variations in the time the donor spends listening, and variations in the force that is applied during listening. Concerning the latter, we have explored various factors that could influence applied force. We have also studied changes in the morphology of live ears during adulthood.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1385/FSMP:1:4:247 | DOI Listing |
J Craniofac Surg
June 2022
Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India. Received May 12, 2021.
Introduction And Objectives: The human external ear is a morphologically perplexing structure with wide variations in its features across individuals. Advances in forensic science have established the use of morphological features and prints of different parts of the human body in establishing the identity of an individual. The present study aims to establish such an identification process by examining the use of comparative analysis of ear prints and ear photographs.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFForensic Sci Int
October 2012
Ecole des Sciences Criminelles, Institut de Police Scientifique, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
The value of earmarks as an efficient means of personal identification is still subject to debate. It has been argued that the field is lacking a firm systematic and structured data basis to help practitioners to form their conclusions. Typically, there is a paucity of research guiding as to the selectivity of the features used in the comparison process between an earmark and reference earprints taken from an individual.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Forensic Sci
March 2008
Department of Digital Technology and Biometry, Netherlands Forensic Institute, Den Haag, The Netherlands.
For all forensic disciplines dealing with identification -- e.g., of glass, tool marks, fibers, faces, fingers, handwriting, speakers -- in which manual (subjective, nonautomated) processes play a role, operator dependencies are relevant.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSci Justice
December 2007
Forensic Pathology Unit, University of Leicester, Robert Kilpatrick Building, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, LE2 7LX, UK.
DNA profiling of biological trace evidence has been used for many years. The application of this technique specifically to the DNA profiling of earprints has not to date been thoroughly investigated. This report presents the results of 60 earprints collected from three healthy adult volunteers under controlled laboratory conditions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Forensic Sci
March 2007
Barge's Anthropologica, Deptartment of Anatomy, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
This cross-sectional anthropometric study was aimed at estimating expansion of the external ear during adult life, in order to evaluate the extent to which anatomical features appearing in earprints may vary with time. A review of the literature was provided. Data extracted from photographed ears of 1353 subjects were analyzed.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!