Background: We conducted a systematic review on the management of psychogenic cough, habit cough, and tic cough to update the recommendations and suggestions of the 2006 guideline on this topic.

Methods: We followed the American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) methodologic guidelines and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework. The Expert Cough Panel based their recommendations on data from the systematic review, patients' values and preferences, and the clinical context. Final grading was reached by consensus according to Delphi methodology.

Results: The results of the systematic review revealed only low-quality evidence to support how to define or diagnose psychogenic or habit cough with no validated diagnostic criteria. With respect to treatment, low-quality evidence allowed the committee to only suggest therapy for children believed to have psychogenic cough. Such therapy might consist of nonpharmacologic trials of hypnosis or suggestion therapy, or combinations of reassurance, counseling, and referral to a psychologist, psychotherapy, and appropriate psychotropic medications. Based on multiple resources and contemporary psychologic, psychiatric, and neurologic criteria (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition and tic disorder guidelines), the committee suggests that the terms psychogenic and habit cough are out of date and inaccurate.

Conclusions: Compared with the 2006 CHEST Cough Guidelines, the major change in suggestions is that the terms psychogenic and habit cough be abandoned in favor of somatic cough syndrome and tic cough, respectively, even though the evidence to do so at this time is of low quality.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4493876PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1378/chest.15-0423DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

habit cough
20
cough
14
psychogenic cough
12
tic cough
12
systematic review
12
psychogenic habit
12
somatic cough
8
cough syndrome
8
cough tic
8
low-quality evidence
8

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • The study aimed to assess how effective spirometry is in differentiating between children diagnosed with Induced Laryngeal Obstruction (ILO), chronic non-specific cough, and various degrees of asthma.
  • Researchers analyzed medical records of 260 children and found that 97% of those with ILO or chronic cough had normal spirometry results, similar to children with mild asthma.
  • The results showed that only children with moderate to severe asthma had significantly lower spirometry values, suggesting that spirometry alone cannot reliably distinguish ILO or chronic cough from mild asthma.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The Habit Cough Syndrome.

Pediatr Pulmonol

February 2024

Division of Respiratory Medicine, Habit Cough Association, Severna Park, Maryland, USA.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!