Background: Differentiating between malignant and benign biliary lesions is critical in clinical practice but is difficult.

Objective: To systematically evaluate the diagnostic performance of single-operator peroral cholangioscopy on indeterminate biliary lesions.

Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Patients: Patients with indeterminate biliary lesions or equivocal ERCP findings.

Main Outcome Measurements: The diagnostic performance of single-operator peroral cholangioscopy on indeterminate biliary lesions. The area under the summary receiver-operating characteristic curve was used as the main indicator for the overall diagnostic performance of single-operator peroral cholangioscopy visual impression (VI) and SpyBite biopsy (SB). The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio were also synthesized.

Results: A total of 8 studies met the inclusion criteria, involving 335 patients who had data on VI and 337 who had data on SB. The area under the curve values on the summary receiver-operating characteristic curve of single-operator peroral cholangioscopy VI and SB were 0.94 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92-0.96) and 0.93 (95% CI, 0.90-0.95) respectively. The combined sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio were 90% (95% CI, 73%-97%), 87% (95% CI, 76%-94%), 7.1 (95% CI, 3.8-13.3), 0.12 (95% CI, 0.04-0.33) for VI and 69% (95% CI, 57%-79%), 98% (95% CI, 92%-99%), 30.1 (95% CI, 8.5-106.9), and 0.32 (95% CI, 0.23-0.44) for SB, respectively.

Limitations: Small number of included studies; comparison with ERCP could not be made.

Conclusion: Single-operator peroral cholangioscopy is a good tool for differentiating malignant and benign biliary lesions. VI is useful for detecting malignant lesion, whereas SB is better at confirming a malignant diagnosis, but VI is not perfect in excluding biliary cancer, nor is SB, and their negative results should be interpreted with caution.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2014.12.021DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

single-operator peroral
24
peroral cholangioscopy
24
likelihood ratio
16
indeterminate biliary
12
biliary lesions
12
diagnostic performance
12
performance single-operator
12
95%
10
systematic review
8
differentiating malignant
8

Similar Publications

Background: This study aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of performing cholangiopancreatoscopy-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection (CA-EMR) for biliopancreatic intraductal lesions.

Methods: Special electrocautery snares and injection needles that can pass through the working channel of a single-operator cholangiopancreatoscope were developed. Between November 2023 and April 2024, we performed CA-EMR for two patients with gallbladder polyps, one patient with a neoplastic lesion in the common bile duct (CBD), and one patient with a neoplastic lesion in the main pancreatic duct.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Disposable digital single-operator cholangioscopy (D-SOC) and direct peroral cholangioscopy (D-POC) using an ultraslim endoscope are established POC modalities for the diagnosis and treatment of various biliary diseases. We compared the usefulness of D-SOC and D-POC for the diagnosis of intraductal superficial lesions of the bile duct (ISL-Bs).

Methods: 38 consecutive patients with suspected biliary diseases who underwent both D-SOC and D-POC were enrolled.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Successful Removal of Gallbladder Stones Under Direct Visualization of Single-Operator Peroral Cholangioscopy (with Video).

Dig Dis Sci

June 2024

Department of Gastroenterology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing Digestive Disease Center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Single-operator peroral cholangioscopy (SOC) has gained popularity in treating biliary and pancreatic conditions but has higher infection rates than traditional methods like ERCP, leading to recommendations for antibiotic prophylaxis (AP).
  • A study analyzed data from 124,921 ERCP procedures, focusing on 1,605 with SOC, aiming to assess the impact of AP on post-procedure infections and overall adverse events (AEs).
  • Findings revealed that AP administration did not significantly reduce rates of infectious complications (3.4% with AP vs. 3.7% without) or overall AEs (14.6% with AP vs. 15.2% without), raising questions about the necessity of AP in these procedures.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Biliary cystadenoma is a type of rare liver cystic tumor. Intrahepatic biliary cystadenomas are the most common, while extrahepatic biliary cystadenomas are rarely seen. Biliary cystadenoma tends to occur in middle-aged to older women and there is a lack of specific preoperative diagnostic markers.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!