AI Article Synopsis

  • Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) has emerged as a new method in urology, effectively treating larger kidney stones, yet there's ongoing debate about whether it's better than percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) for these cases.
  • A study analyzed 154 patients who underwent either PNL (74 patients) or RIRS (80 patients), comparing their success and complication rates in treating stones 2-3 cm in size.
  • Results showed a slightly higher stone-free rate for PNL (95.5%) compared to RIRS (80.6%), but RIRS had fewer complications (8.8% for RIRS versus 13.5% for PNL), suggesting RIRS may be a viable alternative to P

Article Abstract

Objective: Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) performed using a flexible ureterorenoscope marked the beginning of a new era in urology. Today, even staghorn stones are successfully treated via RIRS. The recommended treatment for larger stones is percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL). However, the question of whether PNL or RIRS should be the first-line treatment option for larger stones remains controversial. In this study, we contribute to the debate by comparing the success and complication rates of PNL and RIRS that were used to treat renal pelvis stones 2-3 cm in diameter.

Materials And Methods: The medical records of 154 patients (74 PNL, 80 RIRS) were retrospectively evaluated. PNL patients were placed in Group 1 and RIRS patients in Group 2.

Results: The complete stone-free rates were 95.5% in the PNL group and 80.6% in the RIRS group 1 month postoperatively (P = 0.061). The respective complication rates (evaluated using the Clavien system) were 13.5% and 8.8% (P = 0.520).

Conclusions: RIRS affords a comparable success rate, causes fewer complications than PNL, and seems to be a promising alternative to PNL when larger stones are to be treated. Prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4363980PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/914231DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

larger stones
12
pnl rirs
12
retrograde intrarenal
8
intrarenal surgery
8
treat renal
8
stones 2-3 cm
8
rirs
8
stones treated
8
pnl
8
complication rates
8

Similar Publications

Objective: In Australian EDs, patients experience long waits for imaging, particularly for presentations such as renal colic. Computed tomography (CT) imaging is the gold-standard for renal stones, although ultrasonography is recommended for young patients and those susceptible to radiation, an approach supported by The Canberra Hospital (TCH) ED guidelines for renal colic. This audit aims to not only assess how well these guidelines are adhered to, but also to discuss possible methods of improving flow through ED and thus patient outcomes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Do Emergency Department Observation Units Help Prevent Revisits for Patients with Renal Colic?

Am J Emerg Med

December 2024

Department of Emergency Medicine, Good Samaritan University Hospital, 1000 Montauk Highway, West Islip, New York, United States of America. Electronic address:

Introduction: Renal colic is generally considered a diagnosis appropriate for discharge home once pain is adequately controlled and no other admission criteria are met. The increasing prevalence of ED observation units (EDOU) represent another disposition option for patients with renal colic. In this study, we sought to describe the rates of 14-day revisits for renal colic among patients placed in an EDOU as compared to those discharged from the ED.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Stone-event-free survival after retrograde intrarenal surgery: is the stone-free-status so relevant for the future outcomes?

Int Urol Nephrol

December 2024

Department of Urology, Unidade Local de Saúde de Santo António, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Do Porto, 8th floor, Largo Do Prof. Abel Salazar, 4099-001, Porto, Portugal.

Introduction: The primary aim of stone treatment is to achieve stone-free status. Residual fragments can cause stone growth, recurrence, urinary tract infections, and ureteric obstruction. Our goal was to describe the natural history of stone burden after retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) based on stone-free status (SFS), evaluating stone growth and stone-events.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To evaluate stone free rate (SFR) predictivity of three different scoring systems in patients with kidney stones larger than 20 millimeters undergoing retrograde intrarenal surgery(RİRS).

Methods: Digital records of a total of 166 patients were reviewed retrospectively. Epidemiological characteristics (age, gender, medical history) of the patients, stone and affected kidney characteristics (size, volume, location, density, opaque, presence of urinary system anomaly, presence of stones in different calyx, number of stones, lower pole stone, renal infundibulopelvic angle (IPA), renal infundibulopelvic length (RIL), hydronephrosis), and operative characteristics (preoperative ureteral stent, operation duration, postoperative residual fragments, hospitalization time and complications were recorded.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!