A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Assessing the value of routine upper gastrointestinal contrast studies following bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. | LitMetric

Background: Understanding both the efficacy of upper gastrointestinal (UGI) contrast studies and the factors that impact their accuracy is necessary to optimize postoperative imaging protocols. However, a consensus as to the value of UGI performed after bariatric surgery remains elusive. The objective was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of UGI conducted routinely within 2 days after bariatric surgery for detecting anastomotic leaks.

Methods: We conducted an electronic search of MEDLINE for all English language articles published between 2003 and 2013 concerning diagnostic imaging after bariatric surgery. Nineteen studies evaluating a total of 10,139 patients met the inclusion criteria. The methodological quality of each included study was evaluated using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 procedure.

Results: UGI has an overall sensitivity of .54 and a specificity of 1.00. The standard deviation of the reported sensitivities was .36. Positive and negative predictive values were .67 and .98, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity were negatively correlated.

Conclusions: The sensitivity of UGI for detecting the presence of anastomotic leaks within 2 days of bariatric surgery is moderate overall but fluctuates substantially. The negative correlation between sensitivity and specificity could indicate that the threshold used to distinguish between positive and negative test results varies between institutions. Accordingly, clinicians may consider shifting the threshold for declaring a UGI positive; treating marginal radiological evidence of leakage as presumptively positive may be a simple way to lower specificity, increase sensitivity, and in turn maximize UGI's clinical value.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.11.007DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bariatric surgery
20
sensitivity specificity
16
upper gastrointestinal
8
contrast studies
8
days bariatric
8
positive negative
8
ugi
6
sensitivity
6
bariatric
5
surgery
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!