Results of the 2014 SRS Survey on PJK/PJF: A Report on Variation of Select SRS Member Practice Patterns, Treatment Indications, and Opinions on Classification Development.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

*Department of Neurological Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; †Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; ‡University of Nevada, School of Medicine, Las Vegas, NV; §Silicon Valley Spine Institute, Campbell, CA; ¶Norwich Orthopedic Group, North Franklin, CT; ‖Private Practice, Amarillo, TX; **Instituto de Patologia da Coluna, Sao Paulo, Brazil; ††Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany; ‡‡College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea; §§Chirurgia del Rachide, Padova, Italy; ¶¶Cedars-Sinai, Los Angeles, CA; ‖‖Royal North Shore Hospital, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; ***Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; and †††Hey Clinic, Raleigh, NC.

Published: June 2015

Study Design: An electronic survey administered to Scoliosis Research Society membership.

Objective: To characterize surgeon views regarding proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and proximal junctional failure (PJF) management providing the framework in which a PJK/PJF classification system and treatment guidelines could be established.

Summary Of Background Data: PJK/PJF are common complications of adult spinal deformity surgery. To date, there is no consensus on PJK/PJF definitions, classification, and indications for revision surgery. There is a paucity of data on deformity surgeon practice pattern variations and consensus opinion on treatment and prevention.

Methods: An electronic 19-question survey regarding PJK/PJF was administered to members of the Scoliosis Research Society who treat adult spinal deformity. Determinants included the surgeons' type of practice, number of years in practice, agreement with given PJK/PJF definitions, importance of key factors influencing prevention and revision, prevention methods currently used, and the importance of developing a classification system.

Results: A total of 226 surgeons responded (38.8% response rate). Both 44.4% of surgeons selected "extremely important" and 40.8% selected "very important" that PJK in adult spinal deformity surgery is a very important issue and that a Scoliosis Research Society PJK/PJF classification system and guidelines for detection and prevention of PJK/PJF is a "must have" (18.1%) and "very likely helpful" (31.9%). Both 86.2% and 90.7% of surgeons agreed with the provided definitions of PJK and PJF, respectively. Top 5 revision indications included neurological deficit, severe focal pain, translation or subluxation fracture, a change in kyphosis angle of greater than 30°, chance fracture, spondylolisthesis greater than 6 mm, and instrumentation prominence. The majority of respondents use a PJK/PJF prevention strategy 60% of the time or more, the most common were terminal rod contour, preoperative bone mineral density testing, and frequent radiographical studies during first 3 months postoperative, preoperative bone mineral density medication for low bone mineral density.

Conclusion: The results of this study provide insight from the practicing surgeons' perspective of the management of PJK and PJF that may aid in the validation of current definitions and consensus-based treatment decisions and prevention guidelines.

Level Of Evidence: 5.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000897DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

scoliosis society
12
adult spinal
12
spinal deformity
12
bone mineral
12
pjk/pjf
9
survey pjk/pjf
8
proximal junctional
8
pjk/pjf classification
8
classification system
8
deformity surgery
8

Similar Publications

Objective: The objective of this study is to assess the methodological quality of the 2016 Society on Scoliosis Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Treatment (SOSORT) guidelines for the detection and management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Methods: A diverse group of experts, including practicing chiropractors, chiropractors with a Diplomate by the American Chiropractic Board of Radiology, chiropractors with PhD degrees, and chiropractors involved in teaching within chiropractic programs was invited to participate in the study. Experts independently evaluated the guidelines using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II tool.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Few studies have investigated quality-of-life (QoL)-related outcome measures in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients over long-term follow-up. We investigated whether patients with any given Lenke type improved relative to other types and whether selective fusions resulted in better QoL-related outcome measures.

Methods: We utilized the Harms Study Group database to select patients with AIS who underwent posterior spinal fusion (PSF) with Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire-22 revised (SRS-22r) scores at minimum 10-year follow-up.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is characterized by an asymmetrical formation of the spine and ribcage. Recent work provides evidence of asymmetrical (right versus left side) paraspinal muscle size, composition, and activation amplitude in adolescents with AIS. Each of these factors influences muscle force generation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Study Design: Cross-sectional study of presenter disclosures from the 2022 North American Spine Society (NASS), Scoliosis Research Society (SRS), and Cervical Spine Research Society (CSRS) annual research conferences.

Objective: The current study aimed to evaluate the consistency of financial disclosures for authors presenting at multiple 2022 spine conferences and compared results to those previously reported in 2008.

Summary Of Background Data: Transparent reporting of financial relationships between physicians and industry is seen as an important way to limit/address potential bias.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Early-term complications may not predict long-term success after adult cervical deformity (ACD) correction.

Objective: Evaluate whether optimal realignment results in similar rates of perioperative complications but achieves longer-term cost-utility.

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!