A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Population genomic analysis of 962 whole genome sequences of humans reveals natural selection in non-coding regions. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Whole genome analysis in large samples is essential to understand natural selection's impact on different parts of the genome.
  • In a study of 962 European Americans, about 60% of the strongest positive selection signals were found in intergenic regions, 33% in intronic regions, and over 1% in coding regions.
  • The research identified significant enrichment of purifying selection in certain functional areas like enhancers and transcription factor binding sites, indicating varied evolutionary pressures across genomic domains.

Article Abstract

Whole genome analysis in large samples from a single population is needed to provide adequate power to assess relative strengths of natural selection across different functional components of the genome. In this study, we analyzed next-generation sequencing data from 962 European Americans, and found that as expected approximately 60% of the top 1% of positive selection signals lie in intergenic regions, 33% in intronic regions, and slightly over 1% in coding regions. Several detailed functional annotation categories in intergenic regions showed statistically significant enrichment in positively selected loci when compared to the null distribution of the genomic span of ENCODE categories. There was a significant enrichment of purifying selection signals detected in enhancers, transcription factor binding sites, microRNAs and target sites, but not on lincRNA or piRNAs, suggesting different evolutionary constraints for these domains. Loci in "repressed or low activity regions" and loci near or overlapping the transcription start site were the most significantly over-represented annotations among the top 1% of signals for positive selection.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4373932PMC
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0121644PLOS

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

natural selection
8
positive selection
8
selection signals
8
intergenic regions
8
selection
5
regions
5
population genomic
4
genomic analysis
4
analysis 962
4
962 genome
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!