Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate possible mechanisms for functional improvement and compare ambulation training with surface peroneal nerve stimulation vs. usual care via quantitative gait analysis.
Design: This study is a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Setting: The setting of this study is a teaching hospital of an academic medical center.
Participants: One hundred ten chronic stroke survivors (>12 wks poststroke) with unilateral hemiparesis participated in this study.
Interventions: The subjects were randomized to a surface peroneal nerve stimulation device or usual care intervention. The subjects were treated for 12 wks and followed up for 6-mo posttreatment.
Main Outcome Measures: Spatiotemporal, kinematic, and kinetic parameters of gait were the main outcome measures.
Results: Cadence (F3,153 = 5.81, P = 0.012), stride length (F3,179 = 20.01, P < 0.001), walking speed (F3,167 = 18.2, P < 0.001), anterior-posterior ground reaction force (F3,164 = 6.61, P = 0.004), peak hip power in preswing (F3,156 = 8.76, P < 0.001), and peak ankle power at push-off (F3,149 = 6.38, P = 0.005) all improved with respect to time. However, peak ankle ankle dorsiflexion in swing (F3,184 = 4.99, P = 0.031) worsened. In general, the greatest change for all parameters occurred during the treatment period. There were no significant treatment group × time interaction effects for any of the spatiotemporal, kinematic, or kinetic parameters.
Conclusions: Gait training with peroneal nerve stimulation and usual care was associated with improvements in peak hip power in preswing and peak ankle power at push-off, which may have resulted in improved cadence, stride length, and walking speed; however, there were no differences between treatment groups. Both treatment groups also experienced a decrease in peak ankle ankle dorsiflexion in swing, although the clinical implications of this finding are unclear.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4402113 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000000269 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!