Patterning of mammalian heterodont dentition within the upper and lower jaws.

Evol Dev

Department of Oral Anatomy and Cell Biology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima University, 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima, 890-8544, Japan.

Published: July 2015

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study focuses on the differences and similarities in tooth development between the upper and lower jaws in mammals, specifically examining the house shrew instead of more commonly used rodent models.
  • It highlights how the upper incisor region in shrews overlaps with specific facial structures (medial nasal and maxillary prominences), indicating a complex relationship in tooth formation and gene expression patterns.
  • The researchers found that while there are shared molecular mechanisms influencing tooth type development in both jaws, the location of upper incisors supports established classifications of tooth structure in anatomical studies.

Article Abstract

Mammalian heterodont dentition is differentiated into incisors, canines, premolars, and molars in the mesial-distal direction, in both the upper and lower jaws. Although all the lower teeth are rooted in the mandible, the upper incisors are rooted in the premaxilla and the upper canine and the teeth behind it are in the maxilla. The present study uncovers ontogenetic backgrounds to these shared and differing mesiodistal patterns of the upper and lower dentition. To this end, we examined the dentition development of the house shrew, Suncus murinus, instead of the rodent model animals because the dentition of this primitive eutherian species includes all the tooth classes, and no toothless diastema region. In the shrew, the upper incisor-forming region extended over the medial nasal prominence and the mesial part of the maxillary prominence. Consequently, the maxillary and mandibular prominences were in a mirror-image relationship in terms of the mesiodistally differentiated tooth-forming regions and of the complementary gene expression pattern, with Bmp4 in the mesial and Fgf8 in the distal regions. This suggests shared molecular mechanisms regulating tooth class differentiation between the upper and lower jaws. However, the premaxillary bone appeared within the mesenchyme of the medial nasal prominence, but grew distally beyond the former epithelial boundary with the maxillary prominence to form, finally, the incisive (premaxillary-maxillary) suture just mesial to the canine. Therefore, the developmental locations of the upper incisors are not inconsistent with the classical osteological criterion of the upper canine by comparative odontologists.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ede.12116DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

upper lower
16
lower jaws
12
upper
9
mammalian heterodont
8
heterodont dentition
8
upper incisors
8
upper canine
8
medial nasal
8
nasal prominence
8
maxillary prominence
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!