A transparent and evidence-based priority-setting process promotes the optimal use of resources to improve health outcomes. Decision-makers and funders have begun to increasingly engage representatives of patients and healthcare consumers to ensure that research becomes more relevant. However, disadvantaged groups and their needs may not be integrated into the priority-setting process since they do not have a "political voice" or are unable to organise into interest groups. Equitable priority-setting methods need to balance patient needs, values, experiences with population-level issues and issues related to the health system.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.20529/IJME.2015.030DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

disadvantaged groups
8
priority-setting process
8
ethics equity
4
priority-setting
4
equity priority-setting
4
priority-setting stakeholder
4
stakeholder engagement
4
engagement disadvantaged
4
groups transparent
4
transparent evidence-based
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!