A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Cetuximab in patients with esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. | LitMetric

Esophageal cancer is one cause of the most common cancer death and diagnosed in approximately half a million people annually worldwide, as well as has resulted in worse status, which is responsible for an estimated 482,300 new cases and 406,800 deaths in 2008, and is the fifth highest in the mortality rate among tumor sites. Esophageal cancer mainly occurred in southern and eastern Africa, eastern Asia and some areas of China. The results of meta-analysis suggested that survival rate can be improved [relative risk (RR) 1.6; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.17-2.18]; objective response rate (RR 1.47; 95 % CI 1.05-2.06) and disease control rate (RR 1.21; 95 % CI 1.03-1.43) in combination group are superior to that of the control group; however, the higher incidence of acne-like rash was caused (RR 9.03; 95 % CI 1.64-49.63) . Moreover, collated differences in overall survival rate and progression-free survival remained the most common grade 3/4/5 toxicities, and quality of life after intervention revealed no evidence of a difference between the two groups. With the present evidence, there is no role for cetuximab combined with standard approaches for esophageal cancer.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12032-015-0521-2DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

esophageal cancer
16
survival rate
8
cancer
5
rate
5
cetuximab patients
4
esophageal
4
patients esophageal
4
cancer systematic
4
systematic review
4
review meta-analysis
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!