Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2015.1019781 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
When politics trumps truth: Political concordance versus veracity as a determinant of believing, sharing, and recalling the news.
J Exp Psychol Gen
October 2024
Department of Psychology, Stanford University.
Article Synopsis
- - Resistance to truth and vulnerability to falsehood present significant threats to democracies worldwide, as shown by a study examining beliefs in real vs. fake political headlines among Trump supporters and opponents during the 2020 election.
- - The study found that people were more likely to believe and share headlines that aligned with their political views rather than those that were true, a tendency that persisted across different education levels and reasoning abilities.
- - Key factors influencing this "concordance-over-truth" bias included belief in the objectivity of one’s political side, strong opinions about Trump, and consumption of one-sided media; notably, those with higher analytic reasoning could better identify truths when they matched their ideology.
From book bans to affirmative action: DARVO as a political tool against Critical Race Theory.
J Prev Interv Community
September 2024
Sabi Psychology, PLLC, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
During the most recent wave of anti-racism movements in the U.S., Critical Race Theory has gained attention as a key mechanism to identify, deconstruct, and challenge dominant white American ideologies and their associated institutional practices.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIdentifying American climate change free riders and motivating sustainable behavior.
Sci Rep
March 2024
California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, 91125, USA.
Free riders, who benefit from collective efforts to mitigate climate change but do not actively contribute, play a key role in shaping behavioral climate action. Using a sample of 2096 registered American voters, we explore the discrepancy between two groups of free riders: cynics, who recognize the significance of environmental issues but do not adopt sustainable behaviors, and doubters, who neither recognize the significance nor engage in such actions. Through statistical analyses, we show these two groups are different.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTrumpism, climate and COVID: Social bases of the new science rejection.
PLoS One
January 2024
Department of Sociology, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire, United States of America.
Although the hazards posed by greenhouse warming and COVID-19 are quite different, diagnosis and mitigation prospects for both depend heavily on science. Unfortunately, the reality of both threats has been subject to politicized science rejection in the US, making these deadly problems less tractable. There are substantial parallels between the two cases of science rejection, including common rhetoric and conservative political leadership.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCross-checking journalistic fact-checkers: The role of sampling and scaling in interpreting false and misleading statements.
PLoS One
October 2023
Department of Communication, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States of America.
Professional fact-checkers and fact-checking organizations provide a critical public service. Skeptics of modern media, however, often question the accuracy and objectivity of fact-checkers. The current study assessed agreement among two independent fact-checkers, The Washington Post and PolitiFact, regarding the false and misleading statements of then President Donald J.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!