Utilization and Harmonization of Adult Accelerometry Data: Review and Expert Consensus.

Med Sci Sports Exerc

1MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UNITED KINGDOM; 2School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Queensland, AUSTRALIA; 3Department of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC; 4Schools of Earth and Environment and Sports Science Exercise and Health, University of Western Australia, Western Australia, AUSTRALIA; 5School of Health and Life Science, Glasgow Caledonian University, Scotland, UNITED KINGDOM; 6Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, AUSTRALIA; 7Department of Sport Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, NORWAY; 8National Centre for Sport and Exercise Medicine, School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leicestershire, UNITED KINGDOM; 9School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, South Australia, AUSTRALIA; 10Department of Kinesiology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA; 11School of Health Sciences, University of Salford, Manchester, UNITED KINGDOM; 12Nutritional Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; 13The NIHR Leicester-Loughborough Diet, Lifestyle and Physical Activity Biomedical Research Unit, Leicestershire, UNITED KINGDOM; 14Healthy Active Living and Obesity Research Group, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute; Department of Pediatrics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, CANADA; and 15Risk Factor Assessment Branch, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.

Published: October 2015

Purpose: This study aimed to describe the scope of accelerometry data collected internationally in adults and to obtain a consensus from measurement experts regarding the optimal strategies to harmonize international accelerometry data.

Methods: In March 2014, a comprehensive review was undertaken to identify studies that collected accelerometry data in adults (sample size, n ≥ 400). In addition, 20 physical activity experts were invited to participate in a two-phase Delphi process to obtain consensus on the following: unique research opportunities available with such data, additional data required to address these opportunities, strategies for enabling comparisons between studies/countries, requirements for implementing/progressing such strategies, and value of a global repository of accelerometry data.

Results: The review identified accelerometry data from more than 275,000 adults from 76 studies across 36 countries. Consensus was achieved after two rounds of the Delphi process; 18 experts participated in one or both rounds. The key opportunities highlighted were the ability for cross-country/cross-population comparisons and the analytic options available with the larger heterogeneity and greater statistical power. Basic sociodemographic and anthropometric data were considered a prerequisite for this. Disclosure of monitor specifications and protocols for data collection and processing were deemed essential to enable comparison and data harmonization. There was strong consensus that standardization of data collection, processing, and analytical procedures was needed. To implement these strategies, communication and consensus among researchers, development of an online infrastructure, and methodological comparison work were required. There was consensus that a global accelerometry data repository would be beneficial and worthwhile.

Conclusions: This foundational resource can lead to implementation of key priority areas and identification of future directions in physical activity epidemiology, population monitoring, and burden of disease estimates.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4731236PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000000661DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

accelerometry data
20
data
11
physical activity
8
delphi process
8
data collection
8
collection processing
8
accelerometry
7
consensus
7
utilization harmonization
4
harmonization adult
4

Similar Publications

Although intention is a strong predictor of moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA), several factors moderate the intention-behavior relationship. People experience goal conflict when one of their goals makes it more difficult to pursue other goals. Goal conflict was examined as a moderator of the intention-behavior relation using data from ecological momentary assessments and accelerometer-derived estimates of MVPA.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Instrumenting Parkrun: Usefulness and Validity of Inertial Sensors.

Sensors (Basel)

December 2024

Department of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8ST, UK.

The analysis of running gait has conventionally taken place within an expensive and restricted laboratory space, with wearable technology offering a practical, cost-effective, and unobtrusive way to examine running gait in more natural environments. This pilot study presents a wearable inertial measurement unit (IMU) setup for the continuous analysis of running gait during an outdoor parkrun (i.e.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The importance of trunk motion in wearable based infant spontaneous movement analysis.

Sci Rep

January 2025

Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Chile, Independencia 1027, Independencia, 8380453, Chile.

The characteristics of spontaneous movements in infants are essential for the early detection of neurological pathologies, with the Prechtl method being a widely recognized approach. While the Prechtl method is effective in predicting motor risks, its reliance on the evaluator's expertise limits its scalability, particularly in low-income areas. In such contexts, the use of inertial sensors combined with automated analysis presents a promising accessible alternative; however, more research is necessary to get results comparable to those of the Precht method.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Although prior studies have examined associations of personality traits with sleep, most have investigated self-reported sleep, been cross-sectional, and focused on younger and middle-aged adults. We investigated associations of personality with actigraphic sleep parameters and changes in sleep in 398 cognitively normal adults aged 40-95 years (M ± SD = 70.1 ± 12.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

During summer, children may meet fewer 24 hours Movement Guidelines (24 hr-MGs) [moderate-vigorous physical activity (PA): ≥60 minutes/day, screen time: ≤2 hours/day, sleep: 9-11 hours/day) compared with the school year. Structured environments within community settings (, summer programs) support guideline adherence. Information about the relationship between structured home environments and 24 hr-MGs is needed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!