A reduction of dopamine release or D2 receptor blockade in the terminal fields of the mesolimbic system, particularly the amygdala, clearly reduces conditioned fear. Similar D2 receptor antagonism in the neural substrates of fear in the midbrain tectum attenuates the processing of unconditioned aversive information. However, the implications of the interplay between opposing actions of dopamine in the rostral and caudal segments of the dopaminergic system are still unclear. Previous studies from this laboratory have reported the effects of dopaminergic drugs on behavior in rats in the elevated plus maze, auditory-evoked potentials (AEPs) recorded from the midbrain tectum, fear-potentiated startle, and conditioned freezing. These findings led to an interesting framework on the functional roles of dopamine in both anxiety and fear states. Dopamine D2 receptor inhibition in the terminal fields of the mesolimbic dopamine system generally causes anxiolytic-like effects, whereas the activity of midbrain substrates of unconditioned fear are enhanced by D2 receptor antagonists, suggesting that D2 receptor-mediated mechanisms play opposing roles in fear/anxiety processes, depending on the brain region under study. Dopamine appears to mediate conditioned fear by acting at rostral levels of the brain and regulate unconditioned fear at the midbrain level, likely by reducing the sensorimotor gating of aversive events.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2015.02.036 | DOI Listing |
Elife
January 2025
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, United States.
The central amygdala (CeA) has emerged as an important brain region for regulating both negative (fear and anxiety) and positive (reward) affective behaviors. The CeA has been proposed to encode affective information in the form of valence (whether the stimulus is good or bad) or salience (how significant is the stimulus), but the extent to which these two types of stimulus representation occur in the CeA is not known. Here, we used single cell calcium imaging in mice during appetitive and aversive conditioning and found that majority of CeA neurons (~65%) encode the valence of the unconditioned stimulus (US) with a smaller subset of cells (~15%) encoding the salience of the US.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNeurosci Biobehav Rev
January 2025
Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Netherlands; Centro Linceo Interdisciplinare "Beniamino Segre", Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Roma, Italy. Electronic address:
Fear responses to novel stimuli can be learned directly, through personal experiences (Fear Conditioning, FC), or indirectly, by observing conspecific reactions to a stimulus (Social Fear Learning, SFL). Although substantial knowledge exists about FC and SFL in humans and other species, they are typically conceived as mechanisms that engage separate neural networks and operate at different levels of complexity. Here, we propose a broader framework that links these two fear learning modes by supporting the view that social signals may act as unconditioned stimuli during SFL.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCells
December 2024
Oujiang Laboratory (Zhejiang Lab for Regenerative Medicine, Vision, and Brain Health), Institute of Mental Health and Drug Discovery, School of Mental Health, Wenzhou Medical University, Ouhai District, Wenzhou 325000, China.
Background: glucocorticoids may play an important role in the formation of fear memory, which is relevant to the neurobiology of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). In our previous study, we showed the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) forms a protein complex with FKBP51, which prevents translocation of GR into the nucleus to affect gene expression; this complex is elevated in PTSD patients and by fear-conditioned learning in mice, and disrupting this complex blocks the storage and retrieval of fear-conditioned memories. The timing of release of glucocorticoid relative to the formation of a traumatic memory could be important in this process, and remains poorly understood.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNeurobiol Dis
January 2025
Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, Institut des Neurosciences Paris Saclay, 91400 Saclay, France. Electronic address:
Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is associated with a range of cognitive and behavioral problems. Brain-related comorbidities show clinical heterogeneity depending on the position of the mutation within the multi-promoter dystrophin (DMD) gene, likely due to the differential impact of mutations on the expression of distinct brain dystrophins. A deficiency of the full-length brain dystrophin, Dp427, has been associated with enhanced stress reactivity, characterized by abnormal fear responses in both patients and mdx mouse model.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFLearn Mem
December 2024
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA
Emotional intensity can produce both optimal and suboptimal effects on learning and memory. While emotional events tend to be better remembered, memory performance can follow an inverted U-shaped curve with increasing intensity. The strength of Pavlovian conditioning tends to increase linearly with the intensity of the aversive outcome, but leads to greater stimulus generalization.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!