Antipsychotic prescribing: do conflict of interest policies make a difference?

Med Care

*Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA †Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA ‡Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA §Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD ∥Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA ¶MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MA #RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA **Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA.

Published: April 2015

Background: Academic medical centers (AMCs) have increasingly adopted conflict of interest policies governing physician-industry relationships; it is unclear how policies impact prescribing.

Objectives: To determine whether 9 American Association of Medical Colleges (AAMC)-recommended policies influence psychiatrists' antipsychotic prescribing and compare prescribing between academic and nonacademic psychiatrists.

Research Design: We measured number of prescriptions for 10 heavily promoted and 9 newly introduced/reformulated antipsychotics between 2008 and 2011 among 2464 academic psychiatrists at 101 AMCs and 11,201 nonacademic psychiatrists. We measured AMC compliance with 9 AAMC recommendations. Difference-in-difference analyses compared changes in antipsychotic prescribing between 2008 and 2011 among psychiatrists in AMCs compliant with ≥ 7/9 recommendations, those whose institutions had lesser compliance, and nonacademic psychiatrists.

Results: Ten centers were AAMC compliant in 2008, 30 attained compliance by 2011, and 61 were never compliant. Share of prescriptions for heavily promoted antipsychotics was stable and comparable between academic and nonacademic psychiatrists (63.0%-65.8% in 2008 and 62.7%-64.4% in 2011). Psychiatrists in AAMC-compliant centers were slightly less likely to prescribe these antipsychotics compared with those in never-compliant centers (relative odds ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.94-0.97; P < 0.0001). Share of prescriptions for new/reformulated antipsychotics grew from 5.3% in 2008 to 11.1% in 2011. Psychiatrists in AAMC-compliant centers actually increased prescribing of new/reformulated antipsychotics relative to those in never-compliant centers (relative odds ratio, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.35-1.44; P < 0.0001), a relative increase of 1.1% in probability.

Conclusions: Psychiatrists exposed to strict conflict of interest policies prescribed heavily promoted antipsychotics at rates similar to academic psychiatrists and nonacademic psychiatrists exposed to less strict or no policies.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4360919PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000000329DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

antipsychotic prescribing
12
conflict interest
12
interest policies
12
heavily promoted
12
nonacademic psychiatrists
12
2011 psychiatrists
12
psychiatrists
9
academic nonacademic
8
prescriptions heavily
8
2008 2011
8

Similar Publications

Objectives: In the treatment of agitation in a pediatric emergency department (PED), it is common to use once or as needed (PRN) medications when nonpharmacological management options have failed. Currently, there is limited available evidence on the treatment of pediatric agitation. The objective of this analysis was to characterize the prescribing practices of once or PRN medications for the treatment of agitation in a PED at an academic medical center.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Abstract: Recent clinical trials on slowing dementia progression have led to renewed focus on finding safer, more effective treatments. One approach to identify plausible candidates is to assess whether existing medications for other conditions may affect dementia risk. We conducted a systematic review to identify studies adopting a data-driven approach to investigate the association between a wide range of prescribed medications and dementia risk.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background And Objectives: Despite their limited benefits and serious adverse effects, psychotropics remain frequently prescribed for neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) of dementia. Psychotropic polypharmacy, the use of two or more concomitant psychotropic medications, is therefore not recommended for people with dementia. The objectives of this study were to investigate the prevalence of psychotropic polypharmacy in Australians living with dementia whose caregivers sought external NPS support from Dementia Support Australia (DSA; the national provider of NPS support) and the association of psychotropic polypharmacy with their demographics and NPS characteristics.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This article presents a case demonstrating that multiple medication use can begin on the first outpatient visit if the prescriber makes multiple psychiatric diagnoses and then feels the need to treat each diagnosis with a different central nervous system active medication labeled for each indication. This approach poses potential problems. First, a single drug or perhaps 2 drugs, in this case, may have been sufficient as initial and perhaps final treatment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Mental disorders are prevalent among older adults, often leading to the use of multiple medications, many with anticholinergic properties. Polypharmacy, common in this population, is a major contributor to anticholinergic burden, which is linked to cognitive and physical decline. This study investigates the relationship between polypharmacy and anticholinergic burden across seven anticholinergic burden scales in elderly patients attending the psychiatric outpatient.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!