Objective: To produce free, expert-informed postoperative information for lumbar discectomy patients, satisfying UK National Health Service Information Standards.
Design: A mixed methods approach utilising the Delphi technique and focus groups.
Setting: Five spinal centres across the UK.
Participants: Panel members included 23 physiotherapists, 11 patients and 17 spinal surgeons.
Intervention: Three rounds of questionnaires including open and closed questions and attendance at a clinician/patient focus group.
Results: Response rates of 85%, 26% and 35% were achieved for the Delphi rounds. Ten clinicians and six patients participated in the focus groups. Consensus for leaflet sections was achieved in round 1 and content in round 3. The focus groups informed further revisions.
Conclusions: A consensually agreed, Information Standard compliant, patient lumbar discectomy leaflet was produced containing: (1) normal spine anatomy; (2) anatomy disc herniation and surgery; (3) back protection strategies and (4) frequently asked questions. Illustrations of exercises enable tailoring to the individual patient.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4360785 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006069 | DOI Listing |
JBJS Case Connect
October 2024
Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.
Case: A 73-year old man who underwent previous L2-S1 decompression presenting with new right radicular leg pain. Imaging suggests a large central disk herniation at L1-2 with possible intrathecal extension requiring surgical decompression. When positioned prone on a Jackson frame, neuromonitoring motor signals became diminished, and thus, the case was aborted.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTurk Neurosurg
February 2024
SBÜ Gaziosmanpaşa Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi.
Aim: Minimally-invasive spinal surgery is increasingly being adopted worldwide. In this study, we evaluated the postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings and clinical outcomes of patients who underwent full endoscopic lumbar disk surgery.
Methods: Preoperative and postoperative 3rd and 6th month MRI features, visual analog scale (VAS) score, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and clinical features of patients who underwent percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy between August 2009 and January 2012 were retrospectively analyzed.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
January 2025
Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Objective: To investigate evidence on the prevalence and timeline of RTW after lumbar microdiskectomy.
Summary Of Background Data: While lumbar microdiskectomy is a widely used and well-studied procedure, there is lack of evidence on the postoperative prevalence and schedule of return to work after this type of surgery.
BMC Surg
January 2025
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, PR China.
Background: To investigate and quantify the influence of body mass index (BMI) on the efficacy and outcomes of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic surgery (PTES), a novel minimally invasive surgical technique in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH).
Methods: A total of 55 patients suffering from single-level LDH with or without high iliac crest, scoliosis or calcification, who underwent PTES in our department from January 2019 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups according to BMI.
J Spine Surg
December 2024
Department of Neurosurgery, Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Background: Currently, there remains a high percentage of complications after lumbar discectomy, while there is no uniform tactic to prevent their development. Purpose of the study was to compare the clinical efficacy and return to work rate (RWR) after total disk replacement (TDR) and microsurgical lumbar discectomy (MLD) in railway workers with lumbar disk herniation (LDH).
Methods: We randomly assigned 75 patients out of a total of 81 patients, between 25 and 35 years of age who had one level LDH to undergo single-level TDR surgery (group I, n=37) or MLD surgery (group II, n=38) in the L4-L5 or L5-S1 segments.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!