The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma PROspective Observational Vascular Injury Treatment (PROOVIT) registry: multicenter data on modern vascular injury diagnosis, management, and outcomes.

J Trauma Acute Care Surg

From the University of Texas Health Sciences Center-Houston (J.J.D., J.B.H.), Houston, Texas; University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center-Memphis (S.A.S., T.C.F.), Memphis, Tennessee; R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center (J.M., T.S., T.E.R.), University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland; University of Florida-Jacksonville (D.S.), Jacksonville, Florida; East Carolina Medical Center (N.P.), Benson, North Carolina; and Los Angeles County + University of Southern California Hospital (K.C., K.I.), Los Angeles, California.

Published: February 2015

AI Article Synopsis

  • - A new registry called the PROspective Vascular Injury Treatment (PROOVIT) was created to track in-hospital and long-term outcomes related to vascular injuries, which are serious types of trauma.
  • - The study collected data on 542 vascular injuries from 14 trauma centers, showing that most patients were male (70.5%) and had significant injuries, with a variety of types of arterial and major venous injuries recorded.
  • - Treatment approaches varied, with over half of the cases managed nonoperatively, and notable outcomes included a 12.7% hospital mortality rate and a 7.7% rate of amputations for extremity injuries.

Article Abstract

Background: There is a need for a prospective registry designed to capture trauma-specific, in-hospital, and long-term outcomes related to vascular injury.

Methods: The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma PROspective Vascular Injury Treatment (PROOVIT) registry was used to collect demographic, diagnostic, treatment, and outcome data on vascular injuries.

Results: A total of 542 injuries from 14 centers (13 American College of Surgeons-verified Level I and 1 American College of Surgeons-verified Level II) have been captured since February 2013. The majority of patients are male (70.5%), with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 15 or greater among 32.1%. Penetrating mechanisms account for 36.5%. Arterial injuries to the head/neck (26.7%), thorax (10.4%), abdomen/pelvis (7.8%), upper extremity (18.4%), and lower extremity (26.0%) were identified, along with 98 major venous injuries. Hard signs of vascular injury, including hypotension (systolic blood pressure < 90 mm Hg, 11.8%), were noted in 28.6%. Prehospital tourniquet use for extremity injuries occurred in 20.2% (47 of 233). Diagnostic modalities included exploration (28.8%), computed tomographic angiography (38.9%), duplex ultrasound (3.1%), and angiography (10.7%). Arterial injuries included transection (24.3%), occlusion (17.3%), partial transection/flow limiting defect (24.5%), pseudoaneurysm (9.0%), and other injuries including intimal defects (22.7%). Nonoperative management was undertaken in 276 (50.9%), with failure in 4.0%. Definitive endovascular and open repair were used in 40 (7.4%) and 126 (23.2%) patients, respectively. Damage-control maneuvers were used in 57 (10.5%), including ligation (31, 5.7%) and shunting (14, 2.6%). Reintervention of initial repair was required in 42 (7.7%). Amputation was performed in 7.7% of extremity vascular injuries, and overall hospital mortality was 12.7%. Follow-up ranging from 1 month to 7 months is available for 48 patients via a variety of modalities, with reintervention required in 1 patient.

Conclusion: The PROOVIT registry provides a contemporary picture of the management of vascular injury. This resource promises to provide needed information required to answer questions about optimal diagnosis and management of these patients-including much needed long-term outcome data.

Level Of Evidence: Epidemiologic study, level V.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000000520DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

vascular injury
20
proovit registry
12
american association
8
association surgery
8
surgery trauma
8
trauma prospective
8
vascular
8
injury treatment
8
treatment proovit
8
diagnosis management
8

Similar Publications

Neutrophils play key protective roles in influenza infections, yet excessive neutrophilic inflammation is a hallmark of acute lung injury during severe infections. Phenotypic heterogeneity is increasingly recognized in neutrophil populations; however, how functional variation in neutrophils between individuals determine the diverse outcomes of influenza remains unclear. To examine immunologic responses that may drive varying outcomes in influenza, we infected C57BL/6 (B6) and A/J mice with mouse-adapted influenza A virus A/PR/8/34 H1N1.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Pulmonary endothelial cell (EC) activation is a key factor in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). In sepsis, increased glycolysis leads to lactate buildup, which induces lysine lactylation (Kla) on histones and other proteins. However, the role of protein lactylation in EC dysfunction during sepsis-induced ARDS remains unclear.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations (CSPR) 7th edition includes this new module on the diagnosis and management of vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) with or without neurodegenerative disease. An expert writing group and people with VCI lived experience (PWLE) reviewed current evidence. Existing recommendations were reviewed and revised, and new recommendations added.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is traditionally associated with hepatic parenchymal diseases, such as acute liver failure and cirrhosis. Its prevalence in non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (NCPH) patients, extrahepatic portal vein obstruction (EHPVO), and non-cirrhotic portal fibrosis (NCPF) is less well described. HE in NCPH allows one to study the effect of portosystemic shunting and ammonia without significant hepatic parenchymal injury.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A Novel Method for Hemorrhage Control During Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy with Splenic Vessel Preservation: Triple Occlusion.

Ann Surg Oncol

January 2025

Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

Introduction: Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) has the advantages of reduced blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and a better postoperative quality of life compared with open distal pancreatectomy (ODP). Meanwhile, spleen-preserving laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is the preferred technique for low-grade malignant and benign tumors located in pancreatic body and tail, since it preserves the immune function of the spleen. The splenic-vessel-preserving (SVP) Kimura technique and splenic vessel resection Warshaw technique are the two primary procedures.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!