A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Automatic determination of differential coronary artery motion minima for cardiac computed tomography optimal phase selection. | LitMetric

Rationale And Objectives: Selecting the optimal phase for coronary artery evaluation can be challenging, especially at higher heart rates, given that the optimal phase may differ for each of the coronary arteries. This study aimed to evaluate a novel vessel-specific algorithm which automatically outputs the minimum motion phase per coronary artery.

Materials And Methods: The study included 44 patients who underwent 256-slice cardiac computed tomography for evaluation of chest pain. End-systolic and mid-diastolic minimal motion phases were automatically calculated by a previously validated global motion algorithm and by a new vessel-specific algorithm which calculates the minimum motion for each of the three main coronary arteries, separately. Two readers blindly evaluated all coronary segments for image quality. Median scores per coronary artery were compared by the Wilcoxon signed rank test.

Results: The variation, per patient, between the optimal phases of the three coronary arteries was 5.0 ± 4.5% (1%-22%) for end systole and 4.8 ± 4.1% (0%-19%) for mid diastole. The mean image quality scores per coronary artery were 4.0 ± 0.61 for the vessel-specific approach and 3.80 ± 0.69 for the global phase selection (P < .001). Overall, 46 of 122 arteries had a better score with the vessel-specific approach and five with the standard global approach. Interreader agreement was substantial (k = 0.72).

Conclusions: This study has shown that multiple phases are required to ensure optimal image quality for all three coronary arteries and that a vessel-specific phase selection algorithm achieves superior results to the standard global approach.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2015.01.013DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

coronary artery
16
coronary arteries
16
optimal phase
12
phase selection
12
image quality
12
coronary
10
cardiac computed
8
computed tomography
8
phase coronary
8
vessel-specific algorithm
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!