Cancer vaccines: can they improve survival?

Cancer Biother Radiopharm

NeoStem, Inc. , New York, New York.

Published: May 2015

In patients with metastatic cancer, therapeutic anticancer vaccines are rarely associated with objective antitumor responses; so, many investigators have focused on progression-free survival (PFS) as a key endpoint for clinical trials. However, it is not clear that PFS is a surrogate for overall survival (OS), and OS may be a more appropriate endpoint because of the effects on long-term memory in the adaptive immune system. Recently, reported vaccine trials were reviewed to determine their primary and secondary endpoints and results. Randomized trials testing sipuleucel-T and prostvac-vf in prostate cancer and ipilimumab and eltrapuldencel-T in melanoma were associated with low objective response rates, no improvement in PFS, but statistically significant improvement in OS. Although compared with PFS, it takes longer to get a final result when OS is the primary endpoint; there is increasing evidence that if long-term memory recognition of tumor-associated antigens is the mechanism of action of an investigational product, then OS may be the only valid clinical endpoint for efficacy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/cbr.2014.1805DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

long-term memory
8
cancer vaccines
4
vaccines improve
4
improve survival?
4
survival? patients
4
patients metastatic
4
metastatic cancer
4
cancer therapeutic
4
therapeutic anticancer
4
anticancer vaccines
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!