AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to investigate how the distance of rewards influences their perceived value, particularly when comparing a smaller, socially closer reward to a larger, socially more distant one.
  • The hypothesis suggested that as both rewards are moved away from the subject, the value of the more distant reward would increase at a slower rate, making it more appealing.
  • The findings revealed that this effect occurred when rewards were moved back 20 places but not when moved back just 10 places, suggesting a connection between social distance and the perception of value, similar to how we value time.

Article Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to test the prediction that when two rewards, a smaller but "socially closer" one and a larger but "socially more distant" one, are moved away from the subject by the same social distance, subjective value of the socially more distant reward will increase (i.e. the rate of social discounting will be shallower). The effect was absent when the recipients were moved back 10 places, but emerged when they were moved back 20 places. In addition, the hyperbolic model was found to correctly describe choices between two socially distant rewards. The results confirm similarities between social and temporal discounting.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2015.02.010DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

social discounting
8
socially distant
8
moved places
8
social
4
discounting choice
4
choice rewards
4
rewards people
4
people purpose
4
purpose study
4
study test
4

Similar Publications

Objective: To study the behavioural factors associated with sustained cigarette smoking cessation, and those associated with a current smoker attempting to quit, among current and former cigarette smokers living in low-income South African communities.

Setting: Three low-income areas in South Africa.

Design: In-person surveys with structured questions that asked respondents about their cigarette smoking and quitting behaviour, sociodemographic information and behavioural attributes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: In Uganda, adolescent girls', and young women's (AGYW-15-24 years) current HIV prevalence is fourfold compared with their male counterparts due to compounded social, economic, and environmental factors. Using the Protective Motivation Theory (PMT), we explored HIV-acquisition risk sources and perceived protective factors from AGYW and caregivers' perspective.

Materials And Methods: During 2018, we conducted a qualitative study guided by PMT to explore factors influencing HIV acquisition among AGYW.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Corrigendum to "Temporal discounting for self and friends in adolescence: A fMRI study" [Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 60 (2023) 1-11: 101204].

Dev Cogn Neurosci

January 2025

Erasmus SYNC Lab, the Netherlands; Erasmus School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Erasmus University Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Brain and Development Research Center, the Netherlands; Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, the Netherlands.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

An experimental test of epistemic vigilance: Competitive incentives increase dishonesty and reduce social influence.

Cognition

January 2025

School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, 900 South Cady Mall, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA; Institute of Human Origins, Arizona State University, 777 E University Drive, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA.

Cultural evolutionary theory has shown that social learning is adaptive across a broad range of conditions. While existing theory can account for why some social information is ignored, humans frequently under-utilise beneficial social information in experimental settings. One account of this is epistemic vigilance, whereby individuals avoid social information that is likely to be untrustworthy, though few experiments have directly tested this.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Trust in scientists and their role in society across 68 countries.

Nat Hum Behav

January 2025

Department of Psychology, Education and Child Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Science is crucial for evidence-based decision-making. Public trust in scientists can help decision makers act on the basis of the best available evidence, especially during crises. However, in recent years the epistemic authority of science has been challenged, causing concerns about low public trust in scientists.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!