Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Dependence of the response of a corona-charged aerosol detector (corona CAD) on the concentration and densities of brominated flame retardants and some related substrates was studied. The calibration curves of the substrates did not show linearity and the substrate with a lower density exhibited the stronger response. Regardless of the solvents (chloroform or toluene), and the injected volume of the substrate solution, the signal intensity of the substrate observed by a corona CAD was substantially proportional to 2/3 power law of concentration and proportional to (-2/3) power law of the density of the substrates. These results suggest that the responses should be proportional to the surface area of the particles generated through the drying process in corona CAD. Contrary to the former reports that the detector response of a corona CAD was independent of chemical species, it was proved that the response varies with the density of a substrate.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.2116/analsci.31.61 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!