A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka. | LitMetric

Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka.

Ann Surg

*Iwate Medical University, Morioka, Japan †Hepatobiliary Center-Paul Brousse Hospital, Villejuif, France ‡University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA §Tulane Transplant Institute, Tulane Medical Center, and Louisiana State University and Medical Center, New Orleans, LA ¶Toho University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan ‖Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, South Korea **Mayo Clinic, Florida, FL ††Royal Brisbane Hospital, Queensland, Australia ‡‡Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan §§Beaumont Health System, Michigan, MI ¶¶University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA ‖‖Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France ***Hospital Sirio Libanês, Sao Paulo, Brazil †††Institute Mutualiste Montsouris, France ‡‡‡Ghent University Hospital Medical School, Ghent, Belgium §§§Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire, Strasbourg, France ¶¶¶Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands ‖‖‖Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, Paris, France ****Southampton University Hospital Trust, Hampshire, UK ††††Loreto Nuovo Hospital, Napoli, Italy ‡‡‡‡Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea §§§§University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway ¶¶¶¶Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea ‖‖‖‖San Raffaele Hospital, Milano, Italy *****Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China †††††University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada ‡‡‡‡‡Far-Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan §§§§§Klinikum Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany ¶¶¶¶¶Fujita Health University, Aichi, Japan ‖‖‖‖‖Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong, China ******University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil ††††††Hospital Italiano Buenos Aires, Argentina ‡‡‡‡‡‡Tongji Hospital, HuaZhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan, China §§§§§§Paris-South University Hospital, Orsay, France ¶¶¶¶¶¶Memorial Sloan-Kett

Published: April 2015

The use of laparoscopy for liver surgery is increasing rapidly. The Second International Consensus Conference on Laparoscopic Liver Resections (LLR) was held in Morioka, Japan, from October 4 to 6, 2014 to evaluate the current status of laparoscopic liver surgery and to provide recommendations to aid its future development. Seventeen questions were addressed. The first 7 questions focused on outcomes that reflect the benefits and risks of LLR. These questions were addressed using the Zurich-Danish consensus conference model in which the literature and expert opinion were weighed by a 9-member jury, who evaluated LLR outcomes using GRADE and a list of comparators. The jury also graded LLRs by the Balliol Classification of IDEAL. The jury concluded that MINOR LLRs had become standard practice (IDEAL 3) and that MAJOR liver resections were still innovative procedures in the exploration phase (IDEAL 2b). Continued cautious introduction of MAJOR LLRs was recommended. All of the evidence available for scrutiny was of LOW quality by GRADE, which prompted the recommendation for higher quality evaluative studies. The last 10 questions focused on technical questions and the recommendations were based on literature review and expert panel opinion. Recommendations were made regarding preoperative evaluation, bleeding controls, transection methods, anatomic approaches, and equipment. Both experts and jury recognized the need for a formal structure of education for those interested in performing major laparoscopic LLR because of the steep learning curve.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001184DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

laparoscopic liver
12
consensus conference
12
second international
8
international consensus
8
held morioka
8
liver surgery
8
liver resections
8
questions addressed
8
questions focused
8
liver
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!