Objective: Normal auditory systems appear well habituated to time/phase delays inherent to sound encoding along the hearing organ, sending frequency information non-simultaneously to the central auditory system. Eliminating, or simply perturbing, the cochlear delay might be expected to decrease speech recognition ability, especially under demanding listening conditions. Resources of a larger-scale investigation permitted a preliminary examination of this issue, particularly on a relevant timescale of empirically demonstrated cochlear delays.
Design: In a randomized controlled trial study, word recognition was tested for mono-syllabic tokens treated digitally to exacerbate, if not diminish/nullify, such delays. Speech-weighted noise was used to interfere with listening to time-frequency reversed (nominally no delay) versus non-reversed (natural timing) transforms under three treatments of speech tokens: (1) original-digitally recorded; digitally processed to emphasize (2) transient versus (3) quasi-steady-state components.
Study Sample: Ten normal-hearing young-adult females.
Results: The findings failed to demonstrate statistically significant differences between delay conditions for any of the three speech-token treatments.
Conclusions: An algorithm putatively diminishing frequency-dependent cochlear delays failed to systematically deteriorate performance in all subjects for the fixed time-frequency transform, stimulus parameters, and test materials employed. Yet, trends were evident such that some effect of perturbing cochlear delays could not be ruled out completely.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2014.1002582 | DOI Listing |
J Otol
October 2024
Department of Ear, Nose and Throat - Head and Neck Surgery, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, 1 Jurong East Street 21, Singapore, 609606, Singapore.
To report a case of cochlear implantation with a misplaced electrode array in the vestibule and the causes for the delay in identification. A 23-year-old male with left single-sided deafness underwent cochlear implantation. The intraoperative assessment did not reveal any major red flags of electrode array misplacement.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBrain Sci
December 2024
Department of Audiology and Speech Pathology, The University of Melbourne, 550 Swanston Street, Carlton, VIC 3010, Australia.
Objectives: Hearing loss is highly prevalent in older adults and is independently associated with accelerated cognitive decline. Cochlear implants are usually the only effective treatment for people with severe-profound hearing loss, who have the highest risk of cognitive decline and dementia, however, very few receive them. Current evidence of the effects of cochlear implant use on cognitive decline/dementia outcomes is limited and unclear.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSusac is a rare systemic disease characterized by ischemic events involving the cochlea, brain, and retina. Delay in the diagnosis leads to sight-threatening complications such as neovascular glaucoma.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAudiol Res
December 2024
Division of Audiology, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55902, USA.
Background/objectives: Adult hearing-impaired patients qualifying for cochlear implants typically exhibit less than 60% sentence recognition under the best hearing aid conditions, either in quiet or noisy environments, with speech and noise presented through a single speaker. This study examines the influence of deep neural network-based (DNN-based) noise reduction on cochlear implant evaluation.
Methods: Speech perception was assessed using AzBio sentences in both quiet and noisy conditions (multi-talker babble) at 5 and 10 dB signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) through one loudspeaker.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!