Making an informed decision about participation in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening may be challenging for invitees with lower health literacy skills. The aim of this systematic review is to explore to what extent the level of a person's health literacy is related to their informed decision making concerning CRC screening. We searched for peer-reviewed studies published between 1950 and May 2013 in MEDLINE, EMBASE, SciSearch and PsycINFO. Studies were included when health literacy was studied in relation to concepts underpinning informed decision making (awareness, risk perception, perceived barriers and benefits, knowledge, attitude, deliberation). The quality of the studies was determined and related to the study results. The search returned 2254 papers. Eight studies in total were included, among which seven focused on knowledge, four focused on attitudes or beliefs concerning CRC screening, and one focused on risk perception. The studies found either no association or a positive association between health literacy and concepts underpinning informed decision making. Some studies showed that higher health literacy was associated with more CRC screening knowledge and a more positive attitude toward CRC screening. The results of studies that obtained a lower quality score were no different than studies that obtained a higher quality score. In order to obtain more insight into the association between health literacy and informed decision making in CRC cancer screening, future research should study the multiple aspects of informed decision making in conjunction instead of single aspects.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckv005 | DOI Listing |
J Eval Clin Pract
February 2025
College of Medicine, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA.
Aims And Objectives: Approximately 50% of Americans report having low health insurance literacy, leading to uncertainty when choosing their insurance coverage to best meet their healthcare needs. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the association between lack of prescription drug benefit knowledge and problems paying medical bills among Medicare beneficiaries.
Methods: We analysed the 2021 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey Public Use File of 5586 Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥ 65 years.
J Eval Clin Pract
February 2025
Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing, Division of Public Health Nursing, Bandırma Onyedi Eylül University, Balıkesir, Turkey.
Aim: This study aimed to translate the Environmental Health Literacy Scale (EHLS) into Turkish and assess its construct validity and internal consistency.
Methods: This research employs a methodological design. The research was conducted during the 2022-2023 academic year with a sample of 500 students from the Faculty of Health Sciences.
Iran Biomed J
December 2024
Student Research Committee, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord , Iran.
BMC Psychol
December 2024
Mental Health Education and Counseling Center, Nanchang Hangkong University, 696, Fenghe South Avenue, Nanchang, 330063, China.
Purpose: This study aims to examine how college students' information literacy affects their online learning engagement and what factors contribute to this relationship.
Method: The research adopted the method of cluster sampling to deliver a questionnaire survey to a sample of 1421 students' representative of four colleges. Information Literacy Scale, Online Learning Engagement Scale, Information Literacy Self-Efficacy Scale, and Psychological Resilience Scale were utilized in this study.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
December 2024
Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. Electronic address:
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the use of chatbot and video education to reduce anxiety in patients with breast cancer undergoing RT.
Methods And Materials: This randomized controlled trial included patients with breast cancer scheduled for RT after surgery at an outpatient department of radiation oncology in a cancer center, randomly assigned to four groups: (1) Video+Chatbot, (2) Video+Paper, (3) Paper+Chatbot, and (4) Paper+Paper. In each group, patients received information regarding the treatment process and were frequently asked questions using the designated tool.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!