This study examined the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding (BIDR) with one-, two-, three-, and four-dimensional models and tested the BIDR's discriminant validity with personality variables. A confirmatory and exploratory factor analysis of responses from 600 Chinese university students (314 men, 282 women, 4 missing; M age=20.0 yr.) provided results indicating that the four-factor model fit the data best; i.e., self-deception and impression management split into denial and enhancement. The Denial and Enhancement subscales with personality variables show significant differences, confirming the four-factor model. The cultural differences as a possible reason for the split were discussed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/03.07.PR0.116k18w8DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

desirable responding
8
chinese university
8
university students
8
personality variables
8
four-factor model
8
denial enhancement
8
socially desirable
4
responding chinese
4
students denial
4
denial enhancement?
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!