Equivalence of influenza A virus RNA recovery from nasal swabs when lysing the swab and storage medium versus storage medium alone.

J Virol Methods

Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1301 Michael Hooker Research Center, 135 Dauer Drive, CB #7431, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.

Published: June 2015

Surveillance of healthy individuals at high risk for zoonotic influenza A transmission is important for tracking trends in influenza A epidemiology. Practical measurement methods that maximize viral recovery and produce low variability are essential when low viral loads are expected. For this study, lysing both a nasal swab and its storage medium was compared to lysing the storage medium alone to determine which method results in greater influenza A virus recovery. Independent results from two laboratories suggest that including the swab in the lysis step does not lead to higher influenza A virus recovery, and that recovery is less variable when only the swab storage medium is extracted. These results indicate that simply lysing the swab storage medium is an effective extraction method for nasal swabs collected during studies of influenza A virus exposure among healthy populations.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4519353PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2015.01.008DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

storage medium
24
influenza virus
16
swab storage
16
nasal swabs
8
lysing swab
8
virus recovery
8
storage
6
medium
6
recovery
5
swab
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!