Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Aim: To investigate crural diaphragm (CD) function in systemic sclerosis (SSc) using high-resolution manometry and standardized inspiratory maneuvers.
Methods: Eight SSc volunteers (average age, 40.1 years; one male) and 13 controls (average age, 32.2 years; six males) participated in the study. A high-resolution manometry/impedance system measured the esophagus and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) pressure profile during swallows and two respiratory maneuvers: sinus arrhythmia maneuver (SAM; the average of six EGJ peak pressures during 5-s deep inhalations) and threshold maneuver (TM; the EGJ peak pressures during forced inhalation under 12 and 24 cmH2O loads). Inspiratory diaphragm lowering (IDL) was taken as the displacement of the EGJ high-pressure zone during the SAM.
Results: SSc patients had lower mean lower esophageal sphincter pressure than controls during normal breathing (19.7±2.8 mmHg vs 32.2±2.7 mmHg, P=0.007). Sinus arrhythmia maneuver pressure was higher in SSc patients than in controls (142.6±9.4 mmHg vs 104.6±13.8 mmHg, P=0.019). Sinus arrhythmia maneuver pressure normalized to IDL was also higher in SSc patients than in controls (83.8±13.4 mmHg vs 37.5±6.9 mmHg, P=0.005). Threshold maneuver pressures normalized to IDL were also greater in SSc patients than in controls (TM 12 cmH2O: 85.1±16.4 mmHg vs 43.9±6.3 mmHg, P=0.039; TM 24 cmH2O: 85.2±16.4 mmHg vs 46.2±6.6 mmHg, P=0.065). Inspiratory diaphragm lowering in SSc patients was less than in controls (2.1±0.3 cm vs 3±0.2 cm, P=0.011).
Conclusion: SSc patients had increased inspiratory EGJ pressure. This is an add-on to EGJ pressure and indicates that the antireflux barrier can be trained.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4326141 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i7.2067 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!